Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):433–440. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001028

Table 2.

Consequences and Perceived Effects of Scientific Sharing and Withholding Among Academic Life Scientists, 2000 and 2013 National Surveys

Item 2000 respodentsa 2013 respondentsa P value
No. of respondents (unweighted) 1,849 1,165
Negative consequences of another academic scientist’s failure to share, % answering “yes”
 Stopped collaborating with another academic scientist 22.0 17.2 .01
 Been unable to confirm others’ published results 21.1 24.2 .11
 Abandoned a promising line of research 17.1 16.6 .80
 Had a publication significantly delayed 17.2 15.1 .22
 Delayed sharing with that person or group 13.2 7.5 .001
 Refused to share your information, data or materials with that person or group 9.8 4.6 < .001
Negative consequences of sharing with another academic scientist, % answering “yes”
 Been “scooped” by another scientist 28.1 25.7 .24
 Compromised the ability of a graduate student, post- doctoral fellow, or junior faculty member to publish 10.1 9.4 .55
 Been unable to benefit commercially from your results 5.9 2.6 < .001
Positive consequences of sharing with another academic scientist, % answering “yes”
 Formed collaborations that led to publications 66.9 45.5 < .001
 Performed research that would otherwise not have been possible 43.6 28.9 < .001
 Formed collaborations that led to grants 39.5 32.1 .001
 Opened a new line of research 37.5 27.3 < .001
Perceived effects of withholding, % answering “detracts somewhat” or “detracts greatly”
 The progress of science in your field 64.5 56.7 .001
 The level of communication in your field 67.0 54.9 < .001
 The quality of your relationships with other academic scientists 52.4 44.0 .001
 The progress of your research 47.9 40.4 .002
 The education of students and post-doctoral fellows 47.6 38.8 < .001
 Your satisfaction with your professional career 38.2 42.9 .04
a

Total survey respondent numbers are unweighted; all other data are weighted by strata based on the probability of being selected for inclusion in the sample. The number of responses for any individual cell in the table may vary slightly, depending on the small proportion of respondents who left the question blank.