Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Dec 10;160:30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.036

Table 3. Relationships of individual- and census tract-level characteristics to drug/alcohol network stability among a sample of 172 African-American adults relocated from seven public housing complexes.

Coefficient (p-value)
Characteristics Stage 111 Stage 212 Stage 313
Intercept -- 0.13 (0.90)
Time
Time since relocation -0.05 (0.03) -0.04 (0.35)
Time since wave 3 0.10 (<0.01) 0.08 (0.08)
Participant
ACASI -- 0.57 (0.24) 0.73 (0.15)
Age -- -0.02 (0.08) -0.02 (0.19)
Baseline gender (ref=female) -- -0.54 (0.18) -0.31 (0.46)
Married or cohabiting -- 0.15 (0.78) --
Employed -- -0.28 (0.46) --
Household income -- 0.04 (0.58) --
Number of times changed residence -- -0.004 (0.96) --
Moved to different census tract since last wave -- -0.30 (0.36) --
Depressive symptoms (ref= CESD 20 score < 15) --
 Mild (CESD 20 score= 15-22) -- 0.52 (0.16) --
 Major (CESD 20 score >22) -- -0.37 (0.25) --
Substance use -- 0.63 (0.05) --
Perceived community violence
 Baseline -- 0.12 (0.27) 0.01 (0.94)
 Change since baseline -- 0.20 (0.03) 0.17 (0.09)
Census tract
Economic disadvantage
 Baseline -- 0.38 (0.27) 0.26 (0.48)
 Change since baseline -- 0.34 (0.06) 0.26 (0.16)
Social disorder --
 Baseline -- -0.16 (0.37) --
 Change since baseline -- -0.15 (0.36) --
Violent crime rate (per 1000 residents) --
 Baseline -- -1.52 (0.91) --
 Change since baseline -- 6.36 (0.51) --
Alcohol outlet density --
 Baseline -- -0.03 (0.38) --
 Change since baseline -- -0.03 (0.32) --
Proportion non-Hispanic Black residents --
 Baseline -- 1.4 (0.21) --
 Change since baseline -- 0.27 (0.66) --
Proportion renter-occupied housing --
 Baseline -- -1.02 (0.41) --
 Change since baseline -- 1.01 (0.23) --
Residential instability --
 Baseline -- -3.67 (0.19) --
 Change since baseline -- -0.22 (0.90) --

Note: Drug/alcohol network stability had a Bernoilli distribution. All variables were time-varying unless otherwise noted.

11

Stage 1 assessed the relationship of time to drug/alcohol network stability, and whether gender or baseline substance misuse interacted with time to influence drug/alcohol network stability. Non-significant interactions are not shown.

12

Stage 2 assessed the relationships of each participant and place characteristic to drug/alcohol network stability, controlling for time.

13

Stage 3 assessed the relationship of “change since baseline measures” of place characteristics associated with drug/alcohol network stability in Stage 2 at a p-value≤0.10, controlling for the baseline measures of the selected place characteristics, time, age, gender, ACASI survey administration variable, and other participant characteristics associated with the drug/alcohol network stability at p≤0.05 in Stage 2. Substance use was not included in Stage 3 because it was hypothesized to be a mediator.