Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jan 13;160:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.035

Table 5.

Odds Ratios with 95% CI for logistic regression analysis for different comparisons of receipt of Opioid agonist therapy modalities

Odds Ratio (95% CI) p-value Standardized Coefficient*
Model 1: Odds of receipt of Buprenorphine only compared to Methadone only
Age (10 year increments) 0.67 (0.64-0.70) <.0001 −0.29
Urban Residence 0.74 (0.25-0.33) <.0001 −0.26
Black Race 0.39 (0.35-0.43) <.0001 −0.23
VA Pension Receipt 0.69 (0.59-0.80) <.0001 −0.06
Charlson Comorbidity Index 0.92 (0.90-0.95) <.0001 −0.08
Schizophrenia Diagnosis 0.65 (0.52-0.81) 0.0002 −0.05
Model 2: Odds of receipt of Both Buprenorphine and Methadone in same year Vs Methadone only
Age (10 year increments) 0.63 (0.60-0.66) <0.0001 0.33
Urban Residence 0.35 (0.30-0.42) <0.0001 0.17
Black Race 0.50 (0.44-0.57) <0.0001 0.18
Charlson comorbidity Index 0.96 (0.93-0.99) 0.0064 0.05
Schizophrenia Diagnosis 0.60 (0.44-0.81) 0.0007 0.06
Model 3: Odds of receipt of Buprenorphine only compared to Buprenorphine and Methadone in same year
Age (10 year increments) 1.06 (1.02-1.10) 0.003 0.05
Urban Residence 0.81 (0.71-0.91) 0.004 −0.05
VA Pension Receipt 0.78 (0.64-0.96) 0.0183 −0.03
Black Race 0.76 (0.65-0.88) 0.0004 −0.05
*

The greater the absolute value of the standardized coefficient, the greater the predicted change in the probability of the outcome given a 1 -standard deviation change in the corresponding predictor variable, holding constant the other predictors in the model.