TABLE 4.
Regressions Predicting Number of Substances Used, Psychiatric Status, and Self-Efficacy at Follow-Up
| Model 1: Number of substances used (N = 188) |
Model 2: Psychiatric status (low/high severity) (N = 188) |
Model 3: Self-efficacy score (N = 175) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | IRR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | Coefficient | 95% CI |
| Continuing care = 1 | 2.6 | 0.68, 9.7 | 9.2* | 1.5, 57.3 | −.13 | −0.28, 0.02 |
| Number of trauma events (baseline) |
1.6** | 1.2, 2.3 | 1.8* | 1.1, 2.8 | −.04* | −0.07, −0.001 |
| Number of Trauma Events × Continuing Care |
0.63* | 0.41, 0.99 | 0.46* | 0.25, 0.86 | .05* | 0.000, 0.11 |
| Baseline of follow-up outcomea | 1.4** | 1.1, 1.8 | 2.9** | 1.3, 6.2 | .18** | 0.12, 0.24 |
| Number of arrests (baseline) | 0.98* | 0.96, 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.98, 1.0 | −.00 | −0.003, 0.003 |
| Incarcerated at follow-up | 3.7** | 2.1, 6.6 | 1.6 | 0.43, 5.6 | −.05 | −0.17, 0.06 |
| Prior mental health treatment | 0.84 | 0.52, 1.3 | 2.3* | 1.0, 5.1 | −.01 | −0.07, 0.05 |
| White | 1.4 | 0.84, 2.2 | 0.43 | 0.18, 1.0 | −.04 | −0.10, 0.02 |
| Age | 1.04* | 1.0, 1.1 | 1.1* | 1.0, 1.1 | .00 | −0.002, 0.005 |
| Ever married | 1.1 | 0.62, 1.9 | 0.75 | 0.31, 1.8 | −.02 | −0.08, 0.05 |
| High school/GED | 0.89 | 0.55, 1.4 | 0.55 | 0.25, 1.2 | .08** | 0.03, 0.14 |
| Employed | 1.4 | 0.81, 2.4 | 0.79 | 0.34, 1.9 | −.02 | −0.08, 0.04 |
| Number of children | 0.82** | 0.72, 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.83, 1.5 | −.00 | −0.01, 0.01 |
| Propensity score | 0.64 | 0.23, 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.34, 7.5 | −.00 | −0.13, 0.13 |
Note: IRR = incidence rate ratio; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; GED = general equivalency diploma.
Model 1: Number of substances used at baseline; Model 2: Psychiatric severity score at baseline; Model 3: Self-efficacy score at baseline.
p < .05,
p < .01.