Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Women Crim Justice. 2015 Oct 1;26(2):99–121. doi: 10.1080/08974454.2015.1067173

TABLE 4.

Regressions Predicting Number of Substances Used, Psychiatric Status, and Self-Efficacy at Follow-Up

Model 1: Number of
substances used
(N = 188)
Model 2: Psychiatric status
(low/high severity)
(N = 188)
Model 3: Self-efficacy
score (N = 175)
Variable IRR 95% CI OR 95% CI Coefficient 95% CI
Continuing care = 1 2.6 0.68, 9.7 9.2* 1.5, 57.3 −.13 −0.28, 0.02
Number of trauma events
 (baseline)
1.6** 1.2, 2.3 1.8* 1.1, 2.8 −.04* −0.07, −0.001
Number of Trauma Events ×
 Continuing Care
0.63* 0.41, 0.99 0.46* 0.25, 0.86 .05* 0.000, 0.11
Baseline of follow-up outcomea 1.4** 1.1, 1.8 2.9** 1.3, 6.2 .18** 0.12, 0.24
Number of arrests (baseline) 0.98* 0.96, 1.0 1.0 0.98, 1.0 −.00 −0.003, 0.003
Incarcerated at follow-up 3.7** 2.1, 6.6 1.6 0.43, 5.6 −.05 −0.17, 0.06
Prior mental health treatment 0.84 0.52, 1.3 2.3* 1.0, 5.1 −.01 −0.07, 0.05
White 1.4 0.84, 2.2 0.43 0.18, 1.0 −.04 −0.10, 0.02
Age 1.04* 1.0, 1.1 1.1* 1.0, 1.1 .00 −0.002, 0.005
Ever married 1.1 0.62, 1.9 0.75 0.31, 1.8 −.02 −0.08, 0.05
High school/GED 0.89 0.55, 1.4 0.55 0.25, 1.2 .08** 0.03, 0.14
Employed 1.4 0.81, 2.4 0.79 0.34, 1.9 −.02 −0.08, 0.04
Number of children 0.82** 0.72, 0.95 0.98 0.83, 1.5 −.00 −0.01, 0.01
Propensity score 0.64 0.23, 1.8 1.6 0.34, 7.5 −.00 −0.13, 0.13

Note: IRR = incidence rate ratio; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; GED = general equivalency diploma.

a

Model 1: Number of substances used at baseline; Model 2: Psychiatric severity score at baseline; Model 3: Self-efficacy score at baseline.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01.