Table 7.
Potential mechanisms for reduction of DMTS concentration in DMTS-PS80 formulations
| General mechanism | Evidence for | Evidence against |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical degradation | No substantial evidence | Very little formation of dimethyl disulfide or dimethyl tetrasulfide over time No major chemical degradation products identified by NMR or GC-MS Addition of buffer did not stabilize formulation Stability did not change with pH |
| Evaporation | When outer vial is opened, DMTS smell is apparent, suggesting leaking into outer vial Some A samples, which were contained in slightly larger outer vials, contained condensate and showed larger reduction in DMTS concentration over time Some DMTS detected in headspace measurements ~2 to 5 % volume loss after 29 weeks |
Large amounts of DMTS not detected in headspace measurements |
| Precipitation | Precipitation increased over time and with increasing temperature Large vesicle formation demonstrated in TEM images Precipitate composed of DMTS and PS80 |
Only a small amount of DMTS (385 ± 36 µg DMTS, N = 3) found in precipitate material |
| Adsorption | Some DMTS found in vial caps | Only 31 ± 2 µg DMTS (N = 3) extracted from vial caps |
DMTS dimethyl trisulfide, GC-MS gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, NMR nuclear magnetic resonance, TEM transmission electron microscopy