Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;16(1):109–127. doi: 10.1007/s40268-016-0122-3

Table 7.

Potential mechanisms for reduction of DMTS concentration in DMTS-PS80 formulations

General mechanism Evidence for Evidence against
Chemical degradation No substantial evidence Very little formation of dimethyl disulfide or dimethyl tetrasulfide over time
No major chemical degradation products identified by NMR or GC-MS
Addition of buffer did not stabilize formulation
Stability did not change with pH
Evaporation When outer vial is opened, DMTS smell is apparent, suggesting leaking into outer vial
Some A samples, which were contained in slightly larger outer vials, contained condensate and showed larger reduction in DMTS concentration over time
Some DMTS detected in headspace measurements
~2 to 5 % volume loss after 29 weeks
Large amounts of DMTS not detected in headspace measurements
Precipitation Precipitation increased over time and with increasing temperature
Large vesicle formation demonstrated in TEM images
Precipitate composed of DMTS and PS80
Only a small amount of DMTS (385 ± 36 µg DMTS, N = 3) found in precipitate material
Adsorption Some DMTS found in vial caps Only 31 ± 2 µg DMTS (N = 3) extracted from vial caps

DMTS dimethyl trisulfide, GC-MS gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, NMR nuclear magnetic resonance, TEM transmission electron microscopy