Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 9;16(1):93–107. doi: 10.1007/s40268-015-0120-x

Table 4.

Statistical comparison of key rosuvastatin, simvastatin, and simvastatin acid parameters following co-administration of rosuvastatin (20 mg) or simvastatin (40 mg) with fostamatinib (100 mg twice daily)

Analyte Parameter (units) Treatment n Geometric LS mean Statin + fostamatinib/statin alone
Ratio (%) 90 % CI
Rosuvastatin AUC (ng·h/mL) Rosuvastatin alone 21 93.7
Rosuvastatin + fostamatinib 21 183.4 195.6 177.6–215.3
AUCt (ng·h/mL) Rosuvastatin alone 21 92.2
Rosuvastatin + fostamatinib 21 181.6 197.1 178.84–217.3
C max (ng/mL) Rosuvastatin alone 21 10.6
Rosuvastatin + fostamatinib 21 19.9 188.4 169.4–209.6
Simvastatin AUC (ng·h/mL) Simvastatin alone 21 27.5
Simvastatin + fostamatinib 19 45.1 164.1 133.1–202.4
AUCt (ng·h/mL) Simvastatin alone 21 26.1
Simvastatin + fostamatinib 19 44.4 170.1 137.1–211.0
C max (ng/mL) Simvastatin alone 21 6.5
Simvastatin + fostamatinib 19 13.9 212.5 164.7–274.3
Simvastatin acid AUCt (ng·h/mL) Simvastatin alone 21 12.6
Simvastatin + fostamatinib 19 22.0 174.2 150.0–202.2
C max (ng/mL) Simvastatin alone 21 1.4
Simvastatin + fostamatinib 19 2.6 182.8 156.7–213.3

Results based on linear model with fixed effects for treatment and subject

AUC area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to infinity, AUC t AUC from zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, CI confidence interval, C max, maximum plasma concentration, LS least-squares