Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 26;14(1):50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.10.001

Table 1.

Study characteristics for HoLEP vs OP.

References Level of evidence Country Journal Sample size, n Mean (SD) age, years Mean (SD) TRUS volume, mL
Naspro et al. [12] 2 Italy Eur. Urol. 41 vs 39 66.26 (6.55) vs 67.27 (6.27) 113.27 (35.33) vs 124.21 (38.52)
Salonia et al. [13] 2 Italy Urology 34 vs 29 67.4 (6.7) vs 68 (6.4) 113.8 (37.0) vs 121.0 (34.9)
Kuntz et al. [14], [15], [16] 2 Germany J. Urol., J. Endourol., Eur. Urol. 60 vs 60 69.2 (8.4) vs 71.2 (8.3) 114.6 (21.6) vs 113.0 (19.2)