TABLE 1.
Performance of WASPLab digital imaging compared to manual reading
| Clinical test site | No. of specimens tested | Results (no.)a |
Performance (% [95% CI])b |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP/AP | MN/AN | MN/AP | MP/AN | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
| 1 | 5,604 | 119 | 5,266 | 219 | 0 | 100 (96–100) | 96.0 (95–96) |
| 2 | 41,064 | 680 | 36,333 | 4,051 | 0 | 100 (99–100) | 90.0 (89–90) |
| 3 | 2,217 | 162 | 1,898 | 157 | 0 | 100 (97–100) | 92.4 (91–93) |
| 4 | 8,805 | 406 | 7,616 | 783 | 0 | 100 (99–100) | 90.7 (90–91) |
| Total | 57,690 | 1,367 | 51,113 | 5,210 | 0 | 100 (99–100) | 90.7 (90–91) |
a
MP/AP, manual positive/automation positive; MN/AN, manual negative/automation negative; MN/AP, manual negative/automation positive; MP/AN, manual positive/automation negative.
b
CI, confidence interval.