Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 26;6:22208. doi: 10.1038/srep22208

Table 1. Hydrodynamic properties for Hib PRP-native, Hib PRP-ADH and Hib PRP-TT derivatives.

Sample so20,w (S) ks mL.g−1 10−3 × Mwa g.mol−1 10−3 × Mzb g.mol−1 [η]c mL.g−1 [η]d mL.g−1 [η]e mL.g−1 ks/[η] f/fo
PRP-native 5.9 ± 0.2 400 ± 40 1200 ± 50 1250 ± 60 447 ± 14 445 ± 8 445 ± 6 0.9 ± 1 9.8
PRP-ADH 6.0 ± 0.2 260 ± 40 240 ± 10 325 ± 20 275 ± 4 273 ± 3 275 ± 3 0.9 ± 2 3.3
PRP-TT 30.0 ± 0.5 190 ± 10 7300 ± 420 7700 ± 390 225 ± 2 224 ± 6 224 ± 4 0.9 ± 1 6.4
TTf monomer 7.6 ± 0.1   150 ± 5   5.7 ± 0.1 5.7 ± 0.1     1.3
TTf dimer 11.6 ± 0.2   270 ± 15            

In phosphate-chloride buffer (pH = 6.8, I = 0.10).

aSedimentation equilibrium SEDFIT-MSTAR analysis.

bSedimentation equilibrium MFIT analysis.

cHuggins extrapolation procedure.

dKraemer extrapolation procedure.

eSolomon-Ciuta procedure.

ffrom ref. 33.