Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 26;6:21963. doi: 10.1038/srep21963

Figure 5. Box plots summarizing the inference errors without and with averaging for.

Figure 5

(a) Sontag et al.’s33 method Inline graphic; (b) Inline graphic-min with noise magnitude given Inline graphic, (c) Inline graphic-min with noise magnitude underestimated as 10% the actual Inline graphic, and (d) Inline graphic-min with noise magnitude overestimated as 10 times the actual Inline graphic. The inference error was reduced by 105 times when using the Inline graphic-min approach (21, 22), compared to Sontag et al.’s33 method. Averaging further reduced inference error by at least 30% in all cases (p-values of the paired t-tests consistently were below 0.0282).