Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Oncology. 2013 Sep 24;85(4):216–222. doi: 10.1159/000355107

Table 2.

Treatment description

None (n = 55) Grade 1–2 (n = 50) Grade 3–4 (n = 46) p value (lonckheere-Terpstra test)
Chemo-naïve 33 (60%) 21 (42%) 27 (58.7%) 78
Prior chemotherapy
 Platinums 4 (7%) 2 (4%) 3 (6.5%) 0.83
 Anthracyclines 8 (14.6%) 7 (14.0%) 4 (8.7%) 0.40
 Taxanes 7 (12.7%) 5 (10.0%) 3 (6.5%) 0.30
 5-Fluorouracil 6 (10.9%) 7 (14.0%) 4 (8.7%) 0.77
 Gemcitabine 12 (21.8%) 14 (28%) 13 (28.3%) 0.44
 Other 10 (18.2%) 13 (26%) 5 (10.9%) 0.42
Gemcitabine regimen 0.36
 Gem. alone 40 (72.7%) 38 (76%) 30 (65%)
 Gem. + other chemotherapy 7 (12.7%) 8 (16%) 10 (21.7%)
 Gem. + non -chemotherapy 7 (12.7%) 4 (8%) 6 (13%)
 Gem. + other 1 (1.8%) 0 0
 Cycles received 3 (1,11) 4 (1,14) 4 (1,15) <0.000l
Dose of gemcitabine 0.0075
 1,000 mg/m2 45 (81.8%) 45 (90%) 45 (97.8%)
 750mg/m2 3 (5.5%) 3 (6%) 1 (2.2%)
 Other 7 (12.7%) 2 (4%) 0 (0%)
Schedule 0.40
 Days 1 and 8: 3-week cycle 31 (56.4%) 25 (50%) 30 (65.2%)
 Days 1,8 and 15:4-week cycle 17 (30.9%) 21 (42%) 12 (26.1%)
 Every other week 6 (10.9%) 3 (6%) 1 (2.2%)
 Other 1 (1.8%) 1 (2%) 3 (6.5%)
GCSF treatment 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (6.5%) 0.03
Gem. delayed/held 0 (0%) 2 (4%) 28 (61%) <0.0001
Gem. dose adjusted 0 (0%) 3 (6%) 29 (63.0%) <0.000l
Gem. stopped early 44 (80%) 35 (70%) 24 (52.2%) 0.003