Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 22;4:e1736. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1736

Table 1. Mean ± SEM body weight, heart weight and the heart-to-body weight ratio of WT and db/db mice groups.

Mice group Early time point Late time point
Body weight (g) Heart weight (mg) Heart/body weight ratio Body weight (g) Heart weight (mg) Heart/body weight ratio
WT RAS 18.9 ± 0.5a 134.4 ± 4.5 7.1 ± 0.2d,e 23.7 ± 0.5a 146.8 ± 3.5c 6.2 ± 0.2d
db/db RAS 32.5 ± 0.8a 140.0 ± 3.1 4.4 ± 0.1d 38.6 ± 1.4a,b 183.1 ± 9.1c 4.9 ± 0.3d
WT Sham 21.1 ± 0.2a 125.0 ± 3.7 5.9 ± 0.2e,d 25.8 ± 0.4b 143.3 ± 5.0 5.6 ± 0.1e
db/db Sham 33.3 ± 1.2a 131.4 ± 6.3 4.0 ± 0.1e 32.7 ± 1.6b 131.4 ± 5.8c 4.2 ± 0.3e

Notes.

a

p < 0.001 = Body weight comparison between db/db RAS vs WT RAS at both early and late time points, WT sham vs db/db sham early time point.

b

p < 0.05 = Body weight comparison between WT sham vs db/db sham late time point, db/db RAS vs db/db sham at late time point.

c

p < 0.001 = Heart weight comparison between db/db RAS vs WT RAS at late time point, db/db RAS vs db/db sham at late time point.

d

p < 0.001 = Heart-to-body weight ratio comparison between db/db RAS vs WT RAS at both early and late time points, WT sham vs db/db sham early time point.

e

p < 0.05 = Heart-to-body weight ratio comparison between WT sham vs db/db sham late time point, WT RAS vs WT sham early time point.