Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0150054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150054

Table 2. Predictors of TB positivity amongst all TB symptomatics.

Owing to the size of the dataset, all associations shown as significant have p < 10−5, with the exception of Mumbai patients referred by ART centres (p = 0.01).

Predictor Levels Odds ratio, unadjusted (95% C.I.) Odds ratio, adjusted (95% C.I.)
Mumbai TU
Sex Female 0.84 (0.77, 0.91) 0.85 (0.79, 0.93)
Male Reference Reference
HXTB Previous history 2.4 (2.22, 2.61) 2.22 (2.05, 2.42)
No previous history Reference Reference
Age Child 0.42 (0.35, 0.5) 0.49 (0.4, 0.59)
Adult Reference Reference
Elderly 0.56 (0.48, 0.65) 0.56 (0.48, 0.65)
Provider Private 2.19 (1.85, 2.59) 1.95 (1.65, 2.32)
Medical College 1.52 (1.4, 1.66) 1.32 (1.21, 1.43)
NGO 1.51 (1.1, 2.06) 1.57 (1.13, 2.16)
ART Centre 0.59 (0.32, 1.01) 0.47 (0.25, 0.82)
Public Reference Reference
Other TUs
Sex Female 0.61 (0.58, 0.63) 0.62 (0.6, 0.65)
Male Reference Reference
HXTB Previous history 3.06 (2.95, 3.18) 2.92 (2.81, 3.03)
No previous history Reference Reference
Age Child 0.37 (0.33, 0.41) 0.43 (0.38, 0.48)
Adult Reference Reference
Elderly 0.63 (0.61, 0.66) 0.6 (0.57, 0.63)
Provider Private 1.3 (1.17, 1.45) 1.38 (1.23, 1.53)
Medical College 1.19 (1.13, 1.25) 1.11 (1.06, 1.17)
NGO 0.76 (0.71, 0.83) 0.94 (0.87, 1.02)
ART Centre 0.79 (0.68, 0.9) 0.69 (0.59, 0.79)
Public Reference Reference
Area Tribal & Hilly 1.15 (1.1, 1.2) 1.11 (1.06, 1.17)
Urban 1.2 (1.16, 1.25) 1.07 (1.03, 1.11)
Rural Reference Reference