Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Dec 22;27(3):426–432.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.09.014

Table 1.

Results of In Vitro Water Flow Chamber Experiments

Experiment 0 min 1 min 3 min 5 min 10 min Time-Weighted Average P Value*
50–100-nm
 Control 1 0.899 ± 0.068 1.119 ± 0.254 1.009 ± 0.022 1.056 ± 0.056 1.026 ± 0.038 (0.930–1.121)
 Large magnet 1 0.173 ± 0.072 0.032 ± 0.014 0.017 ± 0.010 0.012 ± 0.006 0.092 ± 0.015 (0.054–0.129) < .05
 Small magnet 1 0.334 ± 0.099 0.137 ± 0.054 0.065 ± 0.030 0.033 ± 0.009 0.158 ± 0.035 (0.072–0.245) < .05
1–5-μm
 Control 1 0.886 ± 0.058 1.086 ± 0.243 0.980 ± 0.197 1.004 ± 0.176 0.994 ± 0.169 (0.575–1.414)
 Large magnet 1 0.240 ± 0.036 0.081 ± 0.049 0.018 ± 0.009 0.011 ± 0.014 0.111 ± 0.010 (0.085–0.137) < .05
 Small magnet 1 0.329 ± 0.032 0.097 ± 0.016 0.037 ± 0.004 0.010 ± 0.006 0.134 ± 0.009 (0.112–0.156) < .05

Note–Values presented as mean ± standard deviation. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

*

Concentrations in water were lower in experimental runs with the magnet compared with matched controls by analysis of variance with Student–Newman–Keuls pairwise comparisons.