Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 27;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0085-7

Table 1.

Summary statistics for use of reproductive health inputs − pooled data: 1993, 1998, 2003, 2008

Variables Contraceptive models Variables Antenatal and delivery
N Mean SD N Mean SD
Modern contraception 8,270 0.150 0.357 Delivery assistance 8,261 0.476 0.499
Use of condoms only 8,270 0.025 0.155 Health facility 8,259 0.458 0.498
Other modern contracep 8,270 0.125 0.331 Woman’s age
Woman’s age  15–19 (Ref) 8,261 0.051 0.221
 15–19 (1 = base) 8,270 0.051 0.221  20–24 8,261 0.205 0.404
 20–24 = (2) 8,270 0.205 0.404  25–29 8,261 0.256 0.436
 25–29 = (3) 8,270 0.256 0.436  30–34 8,261 0.208 0.406
 30–34 = (4) 8,270 0.208 0.406  35–39 8,261 0.158 0.365
 35–39 = (5) 8,270 0.158 0.364  40–44 8,261 0.086 0.281
 40–44 = (6) 8,270 0.086 0.281  45–49 8,261 0.036 0.186
 45–49 = (7) 8,270 0.036 0.187 Birth order
Woman’s education  One child (Ref) 8,261 0.208 0.406
 No educ (1 = Base) 8,270 0.418 0.493  Two children 8,261 0.195 0.396
 Primary = (2) 8,270 0.276 0.447  Three children 8,261 0.158 0.365
 Secondary = (3) 8,270 0.293 0.455  Four and above 8,261 0.438 0.496
 Tertiary = (4) 8,270 0.013 0.115  Woman’s education
Partner education  No educ (Ref) 8,261 0.417 0.493
 No educ (1 = Base) 8,270 0.328 0.469  Primary 8,261 0.276 0.447
 Primary = (2) 8,270 0.168 0.374  Secondary 8,261 0.294 0.455
 Secondary = (3) 8,270 0.400 0.490  Tertiary 8,261 0.013 0.115
 Tertiary = (4) 8,270 0.063 0.243  Partner education
Marriage dummy 8,270 0.896 0.306  No educ (Ref) 8,261 0.327 0.469
Muslim dummy 8,270 0.324 0.468  Primary 8,261 0.168 0.374
Ethnicity  Secondary 8,261 0.400 0.490
 Akan (1 = Base) 8,270 0.424 0.494  Tertiary 8,261 0.063 0.243
 Ga/Dangme = (2) 8,270 0.061 0.239  Missing Husb. Dummy 8,261 0.042 0.200
 Ewe and Guans = (3) 8,270 0.145 0.352 Muslim dummy 8,261 0.324 0.468
 North ethnicities = (4) 8,270 0.328 0.470 Ethnicity
 Others = (5) 8,270 0.042 0.200  Akan (Ref) 8,261 0.424 0.494
Household wealth  Ga/Dangme 8,261 0.061 0.240
 Poorest (1 = Base) 8,270 0.288 0.453  Ewe and Guans 8,261 0.145 0.352
 Poorer = (2) 8,270 0.217 0.412  North ethnicities 8,261 0.328 0.469
 Middle = (3) 8,270 0.183 0.387  Others 8,261 0.042 0.200
 Richer = (4) 8,270 0.171 0.377 Number of elderly 8,261 1.382 0.716
 Richest = (5) 8,270 0.141 0.348 Household wealth
Ecological zones  Poorest (Ref) 8,261 0.288 0.453
 Southern belt (1 = Base) 8,270 0.253 0.435  Poorer 8,261 0.217 0.412
 Capital city = (2) 8,270 0.092 0.288  Middle 8,261 0.183 0.387
 Middle belt = (3) 8,270 0.356 0.479  Richer 8,261 0.171 0.377
 Northern belt = (4) 8,270 0.299 0.458  Richest 8,261 0.141 0.348
Rural dummy 8,270 0.708 0.454 Ecological zones
NSCPHGW 8,270 0.391 0.393  Southern belt (Ref) 8,261 0.253 0.435
NSCPHFT 8,270 0.058 0.165  Capital city 8,261 0.092 0.288
NSCPCCV 8,270 0.717 0.179  Middle belt 8,261 0.357 0.479
No. of living children  Northern belt 8,261 0.299 0.458
 No child (1 = Base) 8,270 0.003 0.052 Rural dummy 8,261 0.708 0.455
 One child = (2) 8,270 0.233 0.423 NSCPHGW 8,261 0.391 0.393
 Two children = (3) 8,270 0.214 0.410 NSCPHFT 8,261 0.058 0.165
 Three children = (4) 8,270 0.170 0.376 NSCPCCV 8,261 0.717 0.179
 Four and above = (5) 8,270 0.380 0.486 Year
Year  1993 dummy 8,261 0.219 0.413
 1993 dummy (1 = Base) 8,270 0.219 0.413  1998 dummy 8,261 0.256 0.436
 1998 dummy = (2) 8,270 0.256 0.436  2003 dummy 8,261 0.291 0.454
 2003 dummy = (3) 8,270 0.291 0.454  2008 dummy 8,261 0.235 0.424
 2008 dummy = (4) 8,270 0.235 0.424 Sample dummy
 Timing of 1st antenatal 7514
 No. antenatal visits 8083

Source: Authors’ calculations. Calculations take account of sample weights. Note that the models on timing of 1st antenatal visits and number of antenatal visits are based on slightly different samples per the sample dummy. NSCPHGW, NSCPHFT and NSCPCCV are the non-self-cluster proportion of households with good water, non-self-cluster proportion of households with flush toilets, and non-self cluster proportion of children under five with complete vaccination, respectively. The values in parentheses next to the variables are the definitional codes. Note, partner’s education includes a 5th category (missing husbands), which is excluded from the table. This was added to cater for women who do not have partners and would otherwise have been dropped from the regressions