Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 27;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0085-7

Table 4.

Socioeconomic determinants of antenatal care and delivery care in Ghana

Variables Antenatal care Delivery care
1st trimester antenatal visit 4+ antenatal visits Health facility deliveries Delivery assistance by health professional
Beta SE Beta SE Beta SE Beta SE
Woman’s age
20–24 0.0684** [0.0302] 0.0327 [0.0232] 0.0399 [0.0311] 0.0620** [0.0304]
25–29 0.1529*** [0.0329] 0.1155*** [0.0236] 0.1382*** [0.0343] 0.1630*** [0.0331]
30–34 0.1480*** [0.0342] 0.1303*** [0.0247] 0.1586*** [0.0384] 0.1875*** [0.0374]
35–39 0.1491*** [0.0375] 0.1461*** [0.0238] 0.1769*** [0.0390] 0.2031*** [0.0385]
40–44 0.1634*** [0.0398] 0.1504*** [0.0227] 0.1948*** [0.0411] 0.2044*** [0.0401]
45–49 0.0974** [0.0430] 0.1250*** [0.0271] 0.1612*** [0.0460] 0.1836*** [0.0455]
Birth order
2nd birth order −0.0188 [0.0206] −0.0637*** [0.0195] −0.1489*** [0.0207] −0.1436*** [0.0207]
3rd birth order −0.0517** [0.0230] −0.1230*** [0.0235] −0.1786*** [0.0232] −0.1935*** [0.0233]
4th plus birth order −0.1211*** [0.0241] −0.1316*** [0.0218] −0.1956*** [0.0260] −0.2085*** [0.0270]
Woman’s education
Primary 0.0280 [0.0182] 0.0625*** [0.0139] 0.0545*** [0.0181] 0.0501*** [0.0180]
Secondary 0.0103 [0.0194] 0.1180*** [0.0168] 0.1461*** [0.0197] 0.1412*** [0.0192]
Tertiary 0.1916*** [0.0601] 0.2217*** [0.0455] 0.2352** [0.0929] 0.2668*** [0.1021]
Partner education
Primary −0.0057 [0.0213] 0.0465*** [0.0171] 0.1100*** [0.0226] 0.1081*** [0.0220]
Secondary 0.0003 [0.0202] 0.0656*** [0.0165] 0.1448*** [0.0200] 0.1401*** [0.0198]
Tertiary 0.0406 [0.0304] 0.1820*** [0.0206] 0.2955*** [0.0324] 0.2871*** [0.0315]
Missing husband dummy −0.0480 [0.0349] −0.0690** [0.0338] 0.0480 [0.0387] 0.0507 [0.0399]
Muslim dummy −0.0509*** [0.0168] −0.0881*** [0.0146] −0.0759*** [0.0189] −0.0833*** [0.0183]
Ethnicity
Ga/Dangme −0.0420 [0.0307] −0.1263*** [0.0306] −0.0333 [0.0338] −0.0374 [0.0330]
Ewe and Guans 0.0174 [0.0176] −0.0217 [0.0194] 0.0072 [0.0242] −0.0119 [0.0248]
Northern ethnicities 0.0565** [0.0244] 0.0401* [0.0218] 0.0345 [0.0295] 0.0315 [0.0288]
Others 0.1067*** [0.0342] 0.0398 [0.0292] 0.1055*** [0.0357] 0.0872** [0.0350]
No. of elder women HH 0.0028 [0.0082] 0.0062 [0.0082] 0.0183* [0.0108] 0.0256** [0.0112]
Household wealth
Poorer 0.0370** [0.0182] 0.0396** [0.0157] 0.0354* [0.0199] 0.0341* [0.0192]
Middle 0.0412** [0.0201] 0.0494*** [0.0164] 0.1075*** [0.0211] 0.1057*** [0.0205]
Richer 0.0961*** [0.0238] 0.1376*** [0.0178] 0.2099*** [0.0258] 0.2051*** [0.0252]
Richest 0.1806*** [0.0293] 0.1951*** [0.0195] 0.2976*** [0.0308] 0.3051*** [0.0301]
Ecological zones
Capital city −0.0426 [0.0282] 0.0647** [0.0271] 0.1215*** [0.0393] 0.1034*** [0.0377]
Middle belt −0.0156 [0.0170] 0.0554*** [0.0157] 0.1355*** [0.0199] 0.1354*** [0.0200]
Northern belt −0.0460* [0.0265] 0.0995*** [0.0227] −0.0117 [0.0313] −0.0109 [0.0311]
Rural dummy 0.0306 [0.0199] −0.0766*** [0.0188] −0.2226*** [0.0235] −0.2289*** [0.0217]
NSCPHGW 0.0319 [0.0255] 0.0492** [0.0245] 0.0829*** [0.0291] 0.0637** [0.0286]
NSCPHFT 0.0038 [0.0432] 0.0333 [0.0596] 0.1221* [0.0664] 0.1601** [0.0651]
NSCPCCV 0.0290 [0.0401] 0.2363*** [0.0362] 0.1228** [0.0500] 0.1514*** [0.0488]
Year
1998 dummy 0.0551** [0.0240] −0.0143 [0.0201] −0.0469* [0.0263] −0.0603** [0.0264]
2003 dummy 0.1040*** [0.0246] 0.0278 [0.0197] −0.0543* [0.0290] −0.0564** [0.0284]
2008 dummy 0.1917*** [0.0229] 0.0944*** [0.0179] 0.0941*** [0.0291] 0.1231*** [0.0279]
No. of observations 7514 8083 8263 8261
Pseudo R 2 0.041 0.145 0.277 0.278
Alpha 985.1906
Chi2 463.5 0.0000
P-value 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Source: Authors’ calculations

Note: *** is significant at p < 0.01, ** is significant at p < 0.05, * is significant at p < 0.10. NSCPHGW, NSCPHFT and NSCPCCV are the non-self cluster proportion of households with good water, non-self cluster proportion of households with flush toilet and non-self cluster proportion of children under five with complete vaccination, respectively

Partner’s education includes a 5th category (missing husbands) but this is excluded from the table. It was added to cater for women who do not have partners and would otherwise have been excluded from the regressions