Table 2.

MVPA results

	Region	Within	Across	F	df	P	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$
Intentional vs accidental harmful	RTPJ	1.13(0.10)	1.05(0.11)	5.27	1,22	0.03	0.19
	LTPJ	1.28(0.06)	1.36(0.05)	2.56	1,21	0.12	0.11
	PC	0.96(0.08)	0.99(0.08)	0.36	1,22	0.55	0.02
	DMPFC	0.91(0.08)	0.87(0.11)	0.52	1,17	0.48	0.03
Intentional vs accidental impure	RTPJ	1.00(0.09)	0.97(0.09)	0.7	1,22	0.41	0.03
	LTPJ	1.26(0.07)	1.24(0.07)	0.12	1,21	0.73	0.01
	PC	0.94(0.10)	0.88(0.08)	1.44	1,22	0.24	0.06
	DMPFC	1.00(0.13)	1.05(0.09)	0.28	1,17	0.6	0.02

Within and Across z-scored correlation coefficients, mean (standard error), for accidental vs intentional acts. While RTPJ, LTPJ and PC discriminated between harm and purity violations, only RTPJ discriminated between accidental and intentional harms and no region distinguished between accidental and intentional purity violations.