Table 4.
Demographic data in each disc type group
| FI | GE | MY | SS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 34 | 38 | 96 | 19 |
| Baseline IOP (mmHg) | 16.1 ± 4.9 | 17.6 ± 3.9 | 16.8 ± 3.5 | 18.0 ± 7.0 |
| Pretreatment spherical equivalent refractive error (D) | −0.75 ± 2.48 | −0.98 ± 3.21 | −5.18 ± 2.97 | −3.77 ± 4.89 |
| p < 0.0001 vs. MY | p <0.0001 vs. MY | p <0.0001 vs. FI and GE | p <0.005 vs. FI and GE | |
| p <0.005 vs. SS | p <0.005 vs. SS | |||
| Mean deviation (dB) | −4.51 ± 2.80 | −4.38 ± 3.71 | −4.96 ± 3.30 | −4.44 ± 2.95 |
| Pattern standard deviation (dB) | 8.80 ± 4.07 | 6.39 ± 4.09 | 8.71 ± 4.18 | 6.99 ± 3.63 |
| p <0.05 vs. GE | p <0.05 vs. FI and MY | p <0.05 vs. GE | ||
| Mean DDLS ± SD | 3.53 ± 0.66 | 3.68 ± 0.81 | 3.91 ± 1.08 | 3.68 ± 0.95 |
| p <0.05 vs. MY | p <0.05 vs. FI |
Data was expressed as mean values ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was tested by ANOVA. FI focal ischemic, GE generalized enlargement, MY myopic glaucomatous, SS senile sclerotic, IOP intraocular pressure, DDLS Disc Damage Likelihood Scale