Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 9;25:261–271. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0728-y

Table 4.

CHIP-CE parent/carer scores by study group

Domain Study groupa Unadjusted mean score (SD) Adjusted mean scoreb (SE) 95 % confidence intervalc MANCOVA Effect size (δ)
F test df P value ADHD vs Control ADHD vs T1DM
Satisfaction ADHD 32.9 (16.3) 34.2 (1.3) 31.6, 36.8 8.7 2, 311 <0.001 ADHD < Control, T1DM 0.68 0.81
T1DM 44.1 (11.5) 45.5 (2.9) 39.8, 51.2
Control 44.1 (16.7) 41.1 (1.9) 37.3, 44.8
Comfort ADHD 42.5 (13.5) 42.4 (1.0) 40.4, 44.4 19.9 2, 311 <0.001 ADHD < Control, T1DM 0.93 0.76
T1DM 51.3 (9.7) 51.0 (2.3) 46.4, 55.5
Control 53.5 (10.3) 53.7 (1.5) 50.7, 56.7
Resilience ADHD 37.7 (14.7) 38.9 (1.1) 36.7, 41.0 3.8 2, 311 0.022 ADHD < Control, T1DM 0.62 0.46
T1DM 43.6 (11.2) 44.7 (2.4) 40.0, 49.4
Control 45.7 (11.0) 43.0 (1.6) 39.9, 46.1
Risk avoidance ADHD 28.7 (15.5) 28.5 (1.1) 26.3, 30.6 79.0 2, 311 <0.001 ADHD < Control, T1DM 1.88 1.84
T1DM 49.7 (8.2) 48.8 (2.4) 44.0, 53.6
Control 50.7 (8.9) 51.5 (1.6) 48.3, 54.7
Achievement ADHD 31.8 (12.0) 32.2 (0.9) 30.5, 34.0 73.5 2, 311 <0.001 ADHD < Control, T1DM 1.96 1.57
T1DM 48.7 (9.9) 48.7 (2.0) 44.8, 52.5
Control 50.7 (7.8) 50.0 (1.3) 47.3, 52.5

ADHD attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, CHIP-CE Child Health and Illness Profile–child edition, df degrees of freedom, MANCOVA multivariate analysis of covariance, SD standard deviation, SE standard error, T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus

a n = 173 in ADHD group, n = 42 in T1DM group and n = 100 in control group

bAdjusted for age and socioeconomic status

cFor adjusted mean score