Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 9;25:261–271. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0728-y

Table 5.

CHIP-CE child scores by study group

Domain Study groupa Unadjusted mean score (SD) Adjusted mean scoreb (SE) 95 % confidence intervalc MANCOVA Effect size (δ)
F test df P value ADHD vs Control ADHD vs T1DM
Satisfaction ADHD 44.5 (11.1) 45.1 (0.9) 43.3, 47.0 0.5 2, 328 NS ADHD = Control = T1DM NS NS
T1DM 43.7 (10.3) 44.8 (1.9) 41.0, 48.5
Control 45.2 (12.0) 43.4 (1.4) 40.8, 46.1
Comfort ADHD 53.5 (8.6) 53.0 (0.7) 51.7, 54.3 5.0 2, 328 0.008 ADHD < Control, T1DM 0.17 0.51
T1DM 57.1 (5.1) 56.2 (1.4) 53.5, 58.9
Control 54.9 (7.8) 56.3 (1.0) 54.4, 58.1
Resilience ADHD 43.9 (10.8) 44.3 (0.8) 42.6, 45.9 2.3 2, 328 NS ADHD = Control = T1DM NS NS
T1DM 47.2 (9.7) 47.8 (1.7) 44.3, 51.1
Control 47.4 (7.9) 46.5 (1.2) 44.1, 48.9
Risk avoidance ADHD 39.8 (10.7) 40.4 (0.8) 38.9, 41.9 30.1 2, 328 <0.001 ADHD < Control, T1DM 1.47 0.76
T1DM 47.4 (9.3) 47.9 (1.6) 44.8, 51.0
Control 51.9 (5.7) 50.4 (1.1) 48.2, 52.6
Achievement ADHD 39.4 (11.3) 39.7 (0.9) 38.0, 41.5 10.0 2, 328 <0.001 ADHD < Control, T1DM 0.25 0.72
T1DM 46.7 (9.0) 47.0 (1.8) 43.5, 50.6
Control 42.2 (10.9) 45.0 (1.3) 42.5, 47.5

ADHD attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, CHIP-CE Child Health and Illness Profile–child edition, df degrees of freedom, MANCOVA multivariate analysis of covariance, NS not significant, SD standard deviation, SE standard error, T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus

a n = 180 in ADHD group, n = 46 in T1DM group and n = 106 in control group

bAdjusted for age and socioeconomic status

cFor adjusted mean score