Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 27;254:505–513. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3273-6

Table 3.

Comparison of dislocation sites of intraocular lenses (IOLs) between in-the-bag and out-of-the-bag dislocation groups

Dislocation sites In-the-bag dislocation Out-of-the-bag dislocation Overall
Group (n = 209)* Group (n = 21)* (n = 230)
1) Prolapse into the AC 25 (12.0 %) 3 (14.3 %) 28 (12.2 %)
2) Pseudophakodonesis 42 (20.1 %) 2 (9.5 %) 44 (19.1 %)
3) Posterior dislocation into the anterior vitreous cavity 104 (49.8 %) 5 (23.8 %) 109 (47.4 %)
4) Trap-door-like dislocation 36 (4.8 %) 1 (4.8 %) 37 (16.1 %)
5) Dropped onto the retina 2 (1.0 %) 10 (47.6 %) 12 (5.2 %)

AC anterior chamber

*Statistically significant difference between the in-the-bag and out-of-the-bag dislocation groups (p < .0001)