Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 14;2016:9841250. doi: 10.1155/2016/9841250

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Errat score for the Mtb-RmlA model. (b) The 3D profile verified results of predicted Mtb-RmlA model. The residues with positive compatibility score are reasonably folded. (c) Diagrammatic presentation of Mtb-RmlA model demonstrating various secondary structural elements. “” represents the conserved regions and “∗∗” represents the semiconserved regions.