Table 3.
Infant abuse | Crude | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | |
Social capital | ||||||||
Low | 12 | 17.4 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
Middle-low | 42 | 9.2 | 0.48 | 0.24–0.97 | 0.49 | 0.24–0.99 | 0.54 | 0.26–1.11 |
Middle-high | 58 | 8.5 | 0.44 | 0.23–0.87 | 0.46 | 0.23–0.92 | 0.56 | 0.27–1.15 |
High | 3 | 4.1 | 0.20 | 0.05–0.75 | 0.20 | 0.05–0.76 | 0.25 | 0.06–0.97 |
p for trend | 0.020 | 0.030 | 0.127 | |||||
Social network | ||||||||
No | 27 | 14.3 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
Yes | 88 | 8.1 | 0.53 | 0.33–0.84 | 0.53 | 0.33–0.86 | 0.59 | 0.36–0.99 |
Italics signifies p < 0.05
Model 1 adjusted for marital status, co-habitants, annual household income, infant’s sex, birth order, and low birth weight
Model 2 model 1 plus social capital and social network