Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 27;17:149. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2494-8

Table 1.

Alignment performance comparison of simulated RRBS reads (10 Million)

Tool Alignmenta time (hours) Memory usage (GB) %Unique reads %Correct mapped
BISMARK 0.53 8.4 81.03 % 80.79 %
BRAT-BW 2.89 12.69 80.46 % 74.11 %
BSMAP 0.34 2.78 87.20 % 85.92 %
BS-SEEKER2 0.66 5.3 73.28 % 71.85 %
LAST 0.71 16.1 78.11 % 77.96 %
TRACE-RRBS 0.26 8.76 88.59 % 87.45 %
METHYLCODER 2.5 25.83 62.38 % 44.82 %
NOVOALIGN 1.19 16.1 86.59 % 86.59 %

aAlignment time doesn’t include the genome preparation time