Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 29;7:270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00270

Table 1.

Classification accuracy of Unidimensional and Bi-factor approaches for 10 advanced placement tests.

Test Year Disattenuated Correlationa NIbCR NIcMC Sample size Accuracy by Unidimensional (%) Accuracy by Bi-factor (%) Accuracy improvement
English Literature 2010 0.778 3 55 20,000 60.90 65.56 4.65%
English Literature 2009 0.77 3 55 20,000 63.04 67.17 4.13%
English Language 2009 0.81 3 55 20,000 63.62 67.56 3.94%
English Language 2010 0.807 3 54 20,000 63.37 67.15 3.78%
European History 2009 0.92 7 80 20,000 68.77 70.33 1.56%
World History 2009 0.89 3 70 20,000 69.70 70.75 1.05%
US History 2010 0.908 3 80 6936d 69.32 70.24 0.92%
European History 2008 0.89 7 80 20,000 68.14 69.06 0.92%
World History 2008 0.91 3 70 20,000 70.92 70.07 0.85%
Physics B 2008 0.96 7 70 11,941 76.73 77.06 0.33%
a

The disattenuated correlation denotes the estimated true score correlation between the subtest scores for the MC and CR items; they were provided by College Board.

b

The number of CR items included in the tests.

c

The number of MC items included in the tests. To maximize the comparability of results, we used 3 CR items and 55 MC items for all 10 tests.

d

US History 2010 data set had a sample size of 20,000. However, only 6936 students chose the same three CR items (i.e., #1, #3, and #4 items).