Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;10:343–357. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92957

Table 4.

Intraocular pressures induced during digital ocular massage

Surgeon Surgeons’ ideal DOM induced pressure (precoaching)
Reproducibility of targeted 90 mmHg (postcoaching)
Compression Range Mean Compression Range Mean Mean-90
A 1) 10 95 1) 13 98 08
2) 13 88 2) 18 100 10
3) 08 70 3) 08 110 20
4) 16 90
Mean 12 86 13 103 13
SEM 02 06 03 04 04
B 1) 46 102 1) 34 107 17
2) 21 93 2) 08 69 21
3) 48 122 3) 03 117 27
4) 21 126
Mean 29 111 15 98 22
SEM 11 08 10 15 03
C 1) 08 93 1) 06 87 03
2) 15 83 2) 10 100 10
3) 06 92 3) 06 91 01
4) 21 70
Mean 13 85 07 93 05
SEM 03 05 01 05 03
D 1) 10 113 1) 06 87 03
2) 07 118 2) 17 85 05
3) 08 97 3) 13 85 05
4) 32 107
Mean 14 109 12 86 04
SEM 06 05 03 01 01
E 1) 19 136 1) 06 105 15
2) 26 130 2) 08 91 01
3) 16 127 3) 17 85 05
4) 16 113
Mean 19 127 10 94 07
SEM 02 05 03 06 04
Mean of mean 17±3 104±8 11±1 95±3 10±3
Mean of SEMs 5±2 6±1 4±2 6±2 3±1

Notes: All pressures are in mmHg. Each individual surgeon had a range and time-weighted mean IOP for their pre- and postcoaching compressions. The absolute value of the difference between the 90 mmHg target pressure and the pressure actually produced during postcoaching massage is shown in the last column, and shows how close the surgeon came to reproducing the target pressure. Statistics on the entire group of surgeons are shown at the bottom of the table.

Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; DOM, digital ocular massage; SEM, standard error of mean.