Table 5.
Categories of HH | HSUV mean | SD | n | 95 % CI | Between groupsa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All participants | |||||
Categories 1 & 2 | 0.80 | 0.19 | 83 | 0.76–0.84 | H = 38.79, p < 0.001 |
Categories 3 & 4 | 0.58 | 0.27 | 138 | 0.54–0.63 | |
All categories | 0.66 | 0.26 | 221 | 0.63–0.70 | |
Males | |||||
Categories 1 & 2 | 0.85 | 0.11 | 35 | 0.82–0.89 | H = 25.36, p < 0.001 |
Categories 3 & 4 | 0.59 | 0.27 | 57 | 0.52–0.67 | |
All categories | 0.69 | 0.26 | 92 | 0.64–0.75 | |
Females | |||||
Categories 1 &2 | 0.75 | 0.22 | 48 | 0.69–0.82 | H = 14.90, p < 0.001 |
Categories 3 & 4 | 0.58 | 0.27 | 81 | 0.52–0.64 | |
All categories | 0.64 | 0.64 | 129 | 0.60–0.69 |
Note: HSUV refers to health state utility values; SD standard deviation; 95 % CI refers to the 95 % confidence interval
aKruskal Wallis one way analysis of variance was used for this test for significance