Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):938–945. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479979.83169.57

Table 3.

Beta-coefficients, standard errors, and exact p-values derived from mixed effects longitudinal models examining the association between treatment track and change in caregivers’ overall ratings of the appearance of their children with clefts.

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
B SE P B SE P B SE P
NO NAM Treatment Reference Reference Reference
NAM Treatment -0.026 0.112 0.819 −0.018 0.111 0.872 −0.080 0.115 0.484
Child's Age −0.424 0.106 <0.001 −0.421 0.106 <0.001 −0.440 0.106 <0.001
Traditional Treatment Reference Reference Reference
NAM Treatment x Child's Age −0.375 0.129 0.004 −0.377 0.129 0.003 −0.364 0.128 0.005
Caregiver Age 0.007 0.005 0.208 0.008 0.005 0.121
Female Caregiver Reference Reference
Male Caregiver 0.093 0.109 0.393 0.054 0.110 0.625
Unilateral Cleft Reference
Bilateral Cleft 0.125 0.079 0.117
Cleft Lip Only Reference
Cleft Lip/Palate 0.133 0.082 0.105
Constant 1.844 0.152 1.630 0.217 1.508 0.223

Pseudo−R2 0.11 0.031 0.11 <0.001 0.11 <0.001
Change in R2 0.00 0.844 0.00 0.761

Note: Models examining the association between covariates and change in cleft severity over time yield similar results.