Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 1;33(1):53–64. doi: 10.1089/ees.2015.0337

Table 2.

Sampling Methods for Once Through Flow Events

Method Description Volume sampled Pros/Cons Likelihood to detect soluble and particulate lead
First draw & profiling Collect first amount of water during flushing and subsequent samples 1–2 L or extent of profile Quantifies all lead in samples collected, very sensitive to flow rate, and likelihood of missing spikes Detects all Pb in water (particulate and soluble) collected but can miss sporadic spikes
Grab samples Collect small samples periodically 10 mL Provides profile of soluble lead, does not sample large portion of flow event, and sensitive to flow Detects soluble lead, may miss particulate spikes
Proportional sampler Splits flow such that a portion is collected for analysis A fraction of daily flow Conventional designs “miss” particulates. Other designs could concentrate particulates. Depends on design
Bins to collect all water from pipe rigs Collects all water during a daily flush Entire daily Collects all water and quantifies suspended fraction, including spikes but not practical Confined to laboratory. Likely to detect all Pb (particulate and soluble)
Whole-house filters Filters lead from all water for an extended period of time Entire Samples large volumes with minimal effort. Misses soluble and small colloidal lead. Potentially quantifies a large fraction of particulates Pb > 1 μm