Table 3. Multinomial Logistic Estimates for Choice of PPP .
| Variable | Government Providers | Private Providers |
| Coefficients | Coefficients | |
| Enrolee characteristics | ||
| Gender: male | -0.3527 | -2.8886a |
| Age | 0.0264 | 0.0328b |
| Basic education | -19.6099 | -19.1138 |
| Secondary education | -16.9830 | -14.2808 |
| Tertiary education | -16.8314 | -16.7729 |
| Income | -0.0027a | -0.0010b |
| Residence-rural | -0.9321b | -2.6162a |
| Facility features | ||
| Availability of drugs | 1.2253 | 2.5911a |
| Shorter waiting time | -0.1320 | 1.4486a |
| Clean environment | 0.1208 | -1.1775b |
| Availability of Doctors | -1.8210a | 1.9270a |
| Presence of additional charges aside insurance | -2.1442a | -1.2934c |
| Reputation of the provider | -2.0851a | -2.6946a |
| Distance (travel time) | -0.0005 | 0.0005 |
| Constant | 23.1486 | 19.6297 |
Abbreviation: PPP, preferred primary healthcare provider.
a,b,c Denotes significance at 1%. 10%, and 5% level, respectively.
Summary Statistics: Obs, 496; R2-Pseudo, 0.3705; Log-likelihood, 270.2479; LR chi-square (28), 318.1400; P value: .0000.
Base outcome is mission health providers.
Results obtained from STATA version 11.