Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;8(1):e2016019. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2016.019

Table 2.

Comparison of the groups with regard to anorectal complication development.

Anorectal complication
P value
Yes (n=34) No (n=45)

Gender 0.670
 • Male 22 (64.7%) 27 (60.0%)
 • Female 12 (35.3%) 18 (40.0%)

Diagnosis 0.009
 • Acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome 29 (85.3%) 24 (53.3%)
 • Lymphoma and multiple myeloma 5 (14.7%) 18 (40.0%)
 • Aplastic anemia 0 3 (6.7%)

Number of comorbidity 0.753
 • No 26 (76.5%) 31 (68.9%)
 • 1 7 (20.6%) 12 (26.7%)
 • 2 1 (2.9%) 2 (4.4%)

Active disease 0.015
 • Yes 23 (67.6%) 18 (40.0%)
 • No 11 (32.4%) 27 (60.0%)

ECOG performance status 0.766
 • 0 8 (23.5%) 14 (31.1%)
 • 1 19 (55.9%) 25 (55.6%)
 • 2 4 (11.8%) 4 (8.9%)
 • 3 3 (8.8%) 2 (4.4)

Type of treatment 0.0001
 • Chemotherapy 30 (88.2%) 13 (28.9%)
 • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 3 (8.8%) 32 (71.1%)
 • Other 1 (2.9%) 0

Febrile neutropenia 0.344
 • No 6 (17.6%) 12 (26.7%)
 • Yes 28 (82.4%) 33 (73.3%)

Use of corticosteroid 14 (41.2%) 14 (31.1%) 0.354

History of anorectal disease before diagnosis of the hematologic disease 0.005
 • No 20 (58.8%) 40 (88.9%)
 • Yes 14 (41.2%) 5 (11.1%)

Death 0.059
 • No 20 (58.8%) 35 (77.8%)
 • Yes 14 (41.2%) 10 (22.2%)