Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 24;10:825–839. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S101900

Table 1.

Design matrix including investigated process variables with their levels

Batch number X1 X2 X3 X4
1 20.0 6.45 3.318 10.0
2 36.818 6.45 5.0 10.0
3 20.0 6.45 5.0 1.591
4 30.0 4.3 4.0 15.0
5 10.0 8.6 4.0 15.0
6 20.0 2.834 5.0 10.0
7 10.0 4.3 6.0 5.0
8 10.0 4.3 4.0 5.0
9 20.0 10.066 5.0 10.0
10 20.0 6.45 5.0 18.409
11 30.0 4.3 6.0 15.0
12 30.0 8.6 4.0 5.0
13 20.0 6.45 6.682 10.0
14 20.0 6.45 5.0 10.0
15 10.0 8.6 6.0 15.0
16 20.0 6.45 5.0 10.0
17 3.182 6.45 5.0 10.0
18 30.0 8.6 6.0 5.0
Variable level Lower extreme (−1.68) Low (−1) Medium (0) High (1) Higher extreme (1.68)
ERL loading (%, w/w) (X1) 3.182 10 20 30 36.818
Emulsifier HLB (X2) 2.834 4.3 6.45 8.6 10.066
Talc percentage (%, w/v) (X3) 3.318 4 5 6 6.682
Dispersed phase volume (mL) (X4) 1.591 5 10 15 18.409

Abbreviations: HLB, hydrophilic lipophilic balance; ERL, Eudragit RLPO.