Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0149717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149717

Table 3. Comparison between each group of patients and the respective CA HC and MA HC group for the eye-tracking data.

Group comparison Age Number of Transitions Matrix/Responses Latency of the first Transition Matrix/Responses Proportion of observational time
Patients Controls Group effect [Matrix complexity*group] Interaction Group effect [Matrix complexity*group] Interaction Matrix Responses
DS / CA HC 24 years 24.3 years p<0.001**** NS p<0.001**** p<0.001**** p<0.001**** p<0.005***
[14.2–38.7] [14.3–37.6]
DS / MA HC 7.1 years 7.2 years NS NS p<0.001**** NS p<0.001**** p<0.05*
[5.7–9.5] [5.3–9.5]
FraX / CA HC 23.8 years 23.2 years p<0.001**** NS p<0.001**** p<0.001**** p<0.001**** p<0.001****
[13.4–31.6] [12.3–31]
FraX / MA HC 5.8 years 6.4 years NS NS p<0.001**** NS p<0.001**** p<0.001****
[4.3–7.5] [4.7–8.1]

CA HC: Chronological Age-matched Healthy Controls; MA HC: Mental Age-matched Healthy Controls; DS: Down’s Syndrome; FraX: Fragile X syndrome

*: p<0.05

***: p<0.005

****: p<0.001; NS: Non Significant.