Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 29;5:232. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1770-z

Table 1.

Analytical results obtained for validation of the optimized procedure after spiking with standard solutions

Metal Type of tobacco sample Amount in unspiked sample (μg/g) Amount added (μg/g) Amount in spiked sample (μg/g) (%) Recovery
Cd Shewa Robit raw tobacco leaves 1.30 ± 0.04 0.26 1.54 ± 0.07 92.3 ± 6.0
Billate processed tobacco leaves 1.45 ± 0.023 0.6 2.03 ± 0.03 96.7 ± 1.9
Nyala processed tobacco leaves 1.55 ± 0.23 0.6 2.11 ± 0.06 93.3 ± 3.6
Cr Shewa Robit raw tobacco leaves 1.45 ± 0.11 0.6 1.99 ± 0.12 90.0 ± 7.8
Billate processed tobacco leaves 1.65 ± 0.08 0.6 2.23 ± 0.03 96.7 ± 1.7
Nyala processed tobacco leaves 1.62 ± 0.11 0.6 2.19 ± 0.08 95.0 ± 4.5
Cu Shewa Robit raw tobacco leaves 7.30 ± 0.19 1.0 8.34 ± 0.02 104 ± 0.3
Billate processed tobacco leaves 9.80 ± 0.04 1.0 10.8 ± 0.08 102 ± 1
Nyala processed tobacco leaves 8.95 ± 0.31 1.0 10.0 ± 0.24 107 ± 3.1
Ni Shewa Robit raw tobacco leaves 1.96 ± 0.08 0.6 2.49 ± 0.02 88.3 ± 0.9
Billate processed tobacco leaves 2.35 ± 0.19 0.6 2.91 ± 0.08 93.8 ± 3.6
Nyala processed tobacco leaves 4.70 ± 0.04 0.6 5.25 ± 0.25 91.7 ± 6.1
Zn Shewa Robit raw tobacco leaves 33.2 ± 1.9 1.4 34.6 ± 0.25 104 ± 0.9
Billate processed tobacco leaves 101 ± 0.4 1.4 103 ± 0.4 106 ± 0.5
Nyala processed tobacco leaves 79.3 ± 0.77 1.4 80.6 ± 0.37 94.3 ± 0.6