Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2015 Sep 2;594(5):1311–1325. doi: 10.1113/JP270752

Development of an experimental model of maternal allergic asthma during pregnancy

Vicki L Clifton 1,9,, Timothy J M Moss 2,3, Amy L Wooldridge 1, Kathryn L Gatford 1, Bahar Liravi 5, Dasom Kim 5, Beverly S Muhlhausler 7, Janna L Morrison 8, Andrew Davies 5,6, Robert De Matteo 4, Megan J Wallace 2,3, Robert J Bischof 2,5
PMCID: PMC4771800  PMID: 26235954

Key points

  • We studied the effects of preconceptional allergen sensitisation and repeated airway allergen challenges during pregnancy on maternal immune and airway functions during pregnancy, and maternal, fetal and placental phenotype in late pregnancy in sheep.

  • This protocol induced maternal responses consistent with an allergic asthmatic phenotype. During pregnancy, lung resistance and the eosinophil influx induced by allergen challenges increased progressively in allergic sheep, and in late pregnancy airway smooth muscle content was greater in allergic than control ewes.

  • Effects on fetal growth and development were consistent with those of maternal asthma in humans. Maternal allergic asthma decreased relative fetal weight by 12%, reduced fetal lung expression of surfactant protein B, and altered placental morphology.

  • This provides an animal model in which to identify mechanisms underlying fetal effects of maternal asthma in pregnancy, including fetal physiological responses to exacerbations, and to evaluate responses to clinically used treatments and novel interventions.

Abstract

Maternal asthma during pregnancy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes but identification of the cause/s, and the ability to evaluate interventions, is limited by the lack of an appropriate animal model. We therefore aimed to characterise maternal lung and cardiovascular responses and fetal–placental growth and lung surfactant levels in a sheep model of allergic asthma. Immune and airway functions were studied in singleton‐bearing ewes, either sensitised before pregnancy to house dust mite (HDM, allergic, n = 7) or non‐allergic (control, n = 5), and subjected to repeated airway challenges with HDM (allergic group) or saline (control group) throughout gestation. Maternal lung, fetal and placental phenotypes were characterised at 140 ± 1 days gestational age (term, ∼147 days). The eosinophil influx into lungs was greater after HDM challenge in allergic ewes than after saline challenge in control ewes before mating and in late gestation. Airway resistance increased throughout pregnancy in allergic but not control ewes, consistent with increased airway smooth muscle in allergic ewes. Maternal allergic asthma decreased relative fetal weight (−12%) and altered placental phenotype to a more mature form. Expression of surfactant protein B mRNA was 48% lower in fetuses from allergic ewes than controls, with a similar trend for surfactant protein D. Thus, allergic asthma in pregnant sheep modifies placental phenotype, and inhibits fetal growth and lung development consistent with observations from human pregnancies. Preconceptional allergen sensitisation and repeated airway challenges in pregnant sheep therefore provides an animal model to identify mechanisms of altered fetal development and adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by maternal asthma in pregnancy.

Key points

  • We studied the effects of preconceptional allergen sensitisation and repeated airway allergen challenges during pregnancy on maternal immune and airway functions during pregnancy, and maternal, fetal and placental phenotype in late pregnancy in sheep.

  • This protocol induced maternal responses consistent with an allergic asthmatic phenotype. During pregnancy, lung resistance and the eosinophil influx induced by allergen challenges increased progressively in allergic sheep, and in late pregnancy airway smooth muscle content was greater in allergic than control ewes.

  • Effects on fetal growth and development were consistent with those of maternal asthma in humans. Maternal allergic asthma decreased relative fetal weight by 12%, reduced fetal lung expression of surfactant protein B, and altered placental morphology.

  • This provides an animal model in which to identify mechanisms underlying fetal effects of maternal asthma in pregnancy, including fetal physiological responses to exacerbations, and to evaluate responses to clinically used treatments and novel interventions.


Abbreviations

BAL

bronchoalveolar lavage

BM

airway basement membrane

dGA

days gestational age

ET

endotracheal

HDM

house dust mite

IUGR

intrauterine growth restriction

RDS

respiratory distress syndrome

RL

lung resistance

RR

risk ratio

SP

surfactant protein

TTN

transient tachypnoea of the newborn

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, characterised by reversible airflow limitation or bronchial hyper‐responsiveness resulting in respiratory symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath and coughing. Asthma has a variety of causes and is phenotypically diverse, but allergic sensitisation is considered the most common initiating factor (Bousquet et al. 2010). Allergic asthma is characterised by an initial airway epithelial response to airborne allergens causing allergen specific IgE activation of lung mast cells (reviewed by Agache et al. 2012). This causes a release of histamine and the subsequent recruitment of leukocytes from the bloodstream to the airway and results in increased hyper‐responsiveness of smooth muscle cells to contractile agents, the adhesion, migration and activation of inflammatory cells to the submucosa, and the secretion of mucus. This manifests as acute exacerbations recognised by increased breathlessness, wheezing, coughing and decreased lung function. Persistent chronic inflammation of the lung leads to airway remodelling with thickening of the bronchial smooth muscle and airway obstruction. However, the effects of pregnancy on many of these responses are unknown.

In women of reproductive age the prevalence of asthma is higher than in the general population: 12% (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.7–14.3%) of females aged 15–29 years and 10.8% (95% CI: 9.4–12.3%) of women aged 30–44 years have asthma (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012). Thus, asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases to affect pregnant women. Pregnancy is recognised as a major challenge in the management of asthma as it can alter the course of asthma severity and its treatment, which in turn can affect pregnancy outcomes. Maternal asthma is a well‐established risk factor for numerous adverse pregnancy outcomes including pre‐eclampsia (risk ratio (RR) 1.54; 95% CI 1.32–1.81), preterm birth (RR 1.41; 95% CI 1.22–1.61), intrauterine growth restriction (RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.22–1.75) (Murphy et al. 2011), peripartum maternal cardiomyopathy (8% vs. 2%; P < 0.0001) (Kao et al. 2013), placental abruption, and antenatal or postnatal haemorrhage (Clifton et al. 2009; Hodyl et al. 2014). In addition to adverse pregnancy outcomes, maternal asthma is a major risk factor for poor neonatal outcome. Analysis of a large retrospective cohort of over 200,000 singleton pregnancies demonstrated that infants of asthmatic mothers were at increased risk of hospitalisation (RR 1.50; 95% CI 1.03–2.20) and this increase in risk was evident in both term and preterm neonates (Hodyl et al. 2014). Risks of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN) are also elevated in infants of mothers who had asthma during pregnancy (Mendola et al. 2014), suggesting that maternal asthma impairs fetal lung development.

Asthma worsens during pregnancy in over 50% of women (Murphy et al. 2005). Asthma exacerbation during pregnancy (defined as any asthma‐related event that involves a hospital admission, an unscheduled doctor visit, a course of oral steroids, an increase in medication use and/or decreased peak expiratory flow rate) is the most significant risk factor for fetal morbidity and mortality in progeny of asthmatic mothers (Murphy et al. 2005). Such exacerbations are common, particularly in women whose asthma is more severe, occurring in 8%, 47% or 65% of pregnant women with mild, moderate or severe asthma, respectively (Murphy et al. 2005). Exacerbations can occur at any time during gestation but are most likely to occur in the second and third trimesters, between weeks 17 and 34, with peak incidence around the 25th week of gestation (Murphy et al. 2005, 2006).

Despite a well‐established association between maternal asthma and adverse pregnancy outcomes, knowledge of the mechanisms underlying these effects remains limited, largely because investigations have been restricted to clinical studies. Numerous studies on the placenta of pregnancies complicated by asthma suggest there are significant alterations in pathways associated with growth that may contribute to reduced fetal development (reviewed by Clifton, 2010) but the impact of these placental alterations on fetal organ systems are unknown and require animal studies to examine mechanisms in more depth. Understanding the relative contributions of asthma severity, exacerbations and treatment to adverse pregnancy, fetal and neonatal outcomes from investigations of clinical cohorts is difficult since it is ethically impossible to randomise women to no treatment for their asthma during pregnancy. Mechanistic information to guide the development of targeted therapies to prevent adverse outcomes is often impossible to obtain from humans. Therefore, there is a need for an animal model of maternal asthma in which mechanistic studies can be undertaken to define the mechanisms by which maternal asthma can affect fetal development, to test the impact of treatment on maternal asthma and fetal development and for the purpose of testing new interventions. Sheep have long been used to study pregnancy, fetal development and perinatal physiology, and a number of medical interventions now routinely used in contemporary obstetrics and neonatology were translated into practice from sheep experiments (Liggins, 1969; Gunn et al. 1997; Roelfsema et al. 2004).

It is possible to induce allergy and asthma in non‐pregnant sheep using house dust mite (HDM) allergen (Bischof et al. 2003, 2008; Snibson et al. 2005), which results in a similar lung phenotype to human asthma (James et al. 2012), with eosinophil infiltration, progressive loss of lung function, increased airway collagen deposition and thickening of bronchial smooth muscle (Bischof et al. 2003; Snibson et al. 2005; Meeusen et al. 2009). HDM allergens are the most prevalent allergens associated with asthma, and have both direct and indirect effects on immune cells, airway epithelial and airway structural cells, thereby mediating pathways to allergic sensitisation, airway inflammation, decline in lung function and airway wall remodelling (Gandhi et al. 2013; Calderón et al. 2015). Mouse models investigating maternal allergic airway exposure and the impact on fetal outcomes have been reported (Hylkema & Blacquiere, 2009; Cook‐Mills, 2015); however, there are limitations when using mouse models as the mother and fetus cannot be chronically instrumented and sample collection is often limited to post mortem. Additionally, airway structure and function in mice, compared to the larger sheep airways, is poorly aligned to the human lung (Allen, 2009; Meeusen et al. 2009). We therefore established the HDM sheep model of experimental asthma upon which the current study is based, and which is considered a relevant model for allergic airways disease (Collie, 2003; Sharma et al. 2003; Meeusen et al. 2009). Given the increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes, including worsening of asthma control and cardiomyopathy, and of adverse fetal outcomes, including intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), we hypothesised that sensitisation to HDM and airway allergen challenges prior to mating in the sheep would result in an eosinophilic allergic phenotype localised to the lung leading to decreased maternal lung function with airway remodelling and induce adverse changes in maternal heart structure and gene expression. We further hypothesised that the presence of an allergic asthmatic phenotype in the maternal system would decrease fetal growth, alter placental phenotype and adversely affect fetal organ development, including lung maturation. The aim of the present study was to develop a sheep model of asthma in pregnancy that reproduces maternal and fetal responses to maternal asthma in human pregnancy. This will provide an experimental model in which to answer mechanistic questions and evaluate interventions not possible in clinical or epidemiological human studies.

Methods

Animals and experimental design

All experimental animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committees of Monash University (MARP/2013/133) and the University of Adelaide (M‐2014‐126), and were conducted in accordance with Australian guidelines (National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, 2013).

Merino ewes (1–2 years of age) were allocated randomly to either non‐immunised control (n = 9) or sensitised (n = 31) groups (Fig. 1). Sheep in the sensitised group were immunised with HDM using four subcutaneous injections of 50 μg of solubilised HDM extract (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus; CSL Ltd, Parkville, VIC, Australia) in sterile 0.9% NaCl, and aluminium hydroxide as adjuvant (1:1), with injections given at 2 week intervals (Bischof et al. 2003). Peripheral blood was collected by venepuncture prior to the commencement of HDM immunisations and again 7 days after the final immunisation, to determine HDM‐specific serum IgE levels and allergic status of immunised sheep; time‐matched samples were collected from control sheep. HDM‐specific IgE levels were determined in duplicate samples by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with optical density read at 450 nm (A 450) (Bischof et al. 2003, 2008). Of the 31 sensitised sheep, there were 17 that showed a twofold or greater increase in IgE levels after HDM immunisation, and these were defined as allergic (Bischof et al. 2003).

Figure 1. Study design .

Figure 1

*Lost to study: 4 allergic and 4 control singleton‐bearing ewes were lost to study due to non‐pregnancy (detected at surgery; n = 1 allergic ewe), sick on farm (n = 1 control), failure to recover post‐surgery (n = 0 control, 1 allergic ewe), fetal death (n = 1 control, 0 allergic ewes) or premature delivery (n = 2 control, n = 2 allergic ewes).

Allergic and control sheep then received weekly endoscopic airway challenges with HDM or saline, respectively (described below), for 8 weeks before timed mating with Merino rams (Fig. 1). Oestrus was synchronised using intravaginal sponges containing 300 mg of the synthetic progestagen flugestone acetate (Eazi‐breed CIDR device, Zoetis Australia Pty Ltd, Rhodes, NSW, Australia) for a 12 day period. Mating dates were recorded, and pregnancy status and fetal number were determined by ultrasound at 40–45 days gestational age (dGA; term ∼147 dGA).

Throughout pregnancy, allergic sheep received endoscopic airway challenges with HDM every 2 weeks, and non‐allergic sheep received endoscopic airway challenges with saline every 4 weeks (Fig. 1). All animals were housed and handled as one group. Sheep were housed outdoors in small paddocks during allergen sensitisation and airway challenges until approximately 90–100 dGA. During this period, sheep grazed natural pastures and were supplemented with lucerne hay. Pregnant sheep were housed indoors in individual pens for the remainder of the experimental period, in a facility with a 12 h:12 h dark–light cycle, and were fed 0.8–1.0 kg lucerne chaff and 0.85 kg ewe and lamb pellets (Rumevite, Ridley AgriProducts, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) daily, with water available ad libitum.

Outcomes were studied in only singleton‐bearing ewes from each group. Singleton‐bearing non‐allergic animals (control, n = 9) included five sheep from the non‐sensitised group plus four sheep from the sensitised group who did not show increases in IgE after the sensitisation protocol, and the allergic group consisted of 11 singleton‐bearing sheep (Fig. 1).

Catheterisation of ewes and fetuses

Surgery was performed at 96–108 dGA (102 ± 1 dGA, mean ± SEM) on control (n = 9) and allergic (n = 11) ewes identified by ultrasound as pregnant with singleton fetuses (Fig. 1). Food was withheld for 24 h prior to surgery, while drinking water remained unrestricted. Prophylactic antibiotics (1 g ampicillin sodium; Aspen Pharmacare Australia) were administered intravenously (i.v.) to the ewe on the day of surgery. General anaesthesia was induced by i.v. injection of 15–20 mg kg−1 sodium thiopentone (Pentothal; Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Australia) and maintained by inhalation of 1.5–3% isoflurane (Delvet, Ceva Animal Health, Glenorie, NSW, Australia). Indwelling catheters were placed into the maternal and fetal carotid arteries and jugular veins, and amniotic fluid (Moss et al. 2003; Westover & Moss, 2012) to enable maternal physiological responses to airway challenges to be recorded and fetal wellbeing to be monitored.

Endoscopic airway challenges and characterisation of maternal immune responses

For endoscopic airway challenges, sheep were restrained unsedated in a custom‐designed body harness and a flexible fibre‐optic endoscope (Model FG‐16X; Pentax Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) was inserted into the lung via the nasal passage (Bischof et al. 2003). In allergic ewes, 5 ml of 100 μg ml−1 HDM extract (in sterile saline) was delivered as a bolus infusion into each of the right and left caudal lobes of the lung, whilst control non‐allergic ewes were similarly challenged with the same volume of saline (Bischof et al. 2003; Meeusen et al. 2009).

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples were collected from the right caudal lobe before the first airway challenge, and then prior to (0 h) and 48 h after airway allergen challenges (Bischof et al. 2003) conducted pre‐mating, at mid‐pregnancy (50–65 dGA; 55 ± 1 dGA) and in late pregnancy (118–132 dGA, 123 ± 1 dGA). Challenges at mid‐ and late pregnancy were delivered as aerosols (see below). BAL cells were fixed and stained in Turk's solution (Merck Millipore, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) and total white blood cells counted using a haemocytometer. Cytospots of BAL samples were prepared on glass microscope slides, stained with Kwik‐Diff (Thermo Electron Corp., Waltham, MA, USA) and white blood cell subpopulations counted using light microscopy.

White blood cell subpopulations were counted in all animals (as detailed above) in maternal blood smears collected immediately before and 24 h and 48 h after challenge in late pregnancy.

Characterisation of maternal lung function responses to aerosolised airway challenges

Allergen‐specific airway responses to HDM challenge in allergic sheep were measured at early (8–28 dGA; 19 ± 2 dGA), mid‐ and late pregnancy (at the same ages as BAL collection as detailed above). Airway responses to saline challenge were measured in early and late pregnancy in control sheep. Similar to airway challenges above, sheep were restrained, unsedated, in a custom‐made sling. Lung function was assessed following aerosolised HDM or saline airway challenges. A solution of HDM extract (100 μg ml−1) for allergic sheep, or saline for control sheep, was nebulised for 15 min at 20 breaths min−1 (Koumoundouros et al. 2006). In order to measure lung resistance (R L), oesophageal and tracheal catheters were placed via the nostrils for measurement of extra‐ and intrathoracic pressures, respectively. A fibre‐optic endoscope was used to guide placement of the catheters, with the tracheal catheter being inserted via a cuffed endotracheal (ET) tube. The ET tube placed through the nostril into the trachea enabled a closed respiratory loop to be established for airway delivery and lung function measures. The aerosol delivery system consisted of a breathing circuit, a Harvard Ventilator (ventilator Model 55‐0723; Harvard 289 Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA), Rapid Flow Nebulizer bowl (Allersearch Laboratories, Oakhurst, NJ, USA) and Vitalair Rapid Nebulizer Pump (Gardner Denver Thomas, Inc., Sheboygan, WI, USA). The nebuliser was connected to the end of the breathing circuit via a T‐piece to the ET tube, during aerosol challenges only, with the ventilator set at 20 breaths min−1, inspiratory time 1.5 s and a tidal volume of 300 ml. The oesophageal and tracheal catheters were connected to differential pressure transducers (GE Druck, ThermoFisher Scientific, Scoresby, VIC, Australia), recorded via LabChart software (ADInstruments, Bella Vista, NSW, Australia), and R L was derived from breath‐by‐breath analysis of intra‐ and extrathoracic pressures for a period of 25 min after aerosol challenge (Koumoundouros et al. 2006).

Post mortem and tissue collection

Ewes were humanely killed at 140 ± 1 dGA by i.v. administration of an overdose of sodium thiopentone (Thiobarb, Jurox Pty Ltd, Rutherford, NSW, Australia). The uterus was removed by hysterectomy, amniotic fluid sampled, and the fetus removed and weighed. Maternal and fetal lung, heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, brain and fat depots (perirenal, retroperitoneal and omental), were dissected and weighed. Visceral fat weight was calculated as the sum of omental, retroperitoneal and perirenal fat depot weights. Maternal lungs and heart were processed as described below. All placentomes were removed from the endometrium, individually weighed and scored for phenotype (Type A, B, C or D) (Vatnick et al. 1991).

Maternal lung structure

Tissue was sampled from the left caudal lobe of the maternal lung, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for embedding in paraffin. Consecutive tissue sections cut at 4 μm were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome or immunostained for airway mast cells (Snibson et al. 2005; Bischof et al. 2008). To assess airway wall remodelling in asthmatic sheep, collagen and smooth muscle area contents of the airway wall were determined by digital colour analysis of Masson's trichrome‐stained histological sections (Snibson et al. 2005). Digital images were scanned using an Aperio Image Capture device and Imagescope software (Leica Biosystems Imaging Inc., Vista, CA, USA). Image analysis of 5–10 bronchioles and small bronchi, ranging from 200 to 2000 μm in diameter (calculations based on airway basement membrane perimeter), were performed on Masson's trichrome‐stained lung sections using FIJI Image‐J software (Schindelin et al. 2012), with all measurements standardised to airway basement membrane (BM) length to adjust for airway size (Snibson et al. 2005). Lung tissues immunostained for tryptase+ mast cells were scanned as above and total number of stained cells were counted in 10 scanned images of lung parenchyma (presented as cells per square millimetre of lung parenchyma) and in separate counts around the airway wall of 5–10 bronchioles and small bronchi (total and degranulated mast cells per BM length, as detailed above).

Maternal heart measurements and gene expression

The heart was weighed, dissected, and each ventricular free wall was weighed separately. A sample of the left ventricular free wall was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was isolated from samples of the left ventricular free wall (∼50 mg) of each ewe, and cDNA was synthesised as previously described (Wang et al. 2011).

The reference genes (β actin, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 and tyrosine 3‐monooxygenase (YWAHZ)) were chosen (Duffield et al. 2009; Passmore et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2013; Hellemans & Vandesompele, 2014) based on expression analysis using the geNorm component of the qBase (Biogazelle, Zwinjnaarde, Belgium) relative quantification analysis software (Hellemans et al. 2007) because their expression was stable across samples (maximum value, factor = 0.3–0.4; Vandesompele et al. 2002; Soo et al. 2012; Hellemans & Vandesompele, 2014). The relative expression of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) transcripts of molecules involved in physiological hypertrophy (IGF1, IGF1R and IGF2; Gentili et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2010), pathological hypertrophy (ANP, BNP, IGF2R and AT1R; Lie et al. 2013, 2014; Zhang et al. 2013), cortisol availability (GR, MR, 11βHSD1 and 11βHSD2; Gentili et al. 2009), inflammation (TNFα and IL1β), fibrosis (TGFβ, collagen type II, MMP 2, TIMP 1, TIMP 2 and TIMP 3; Zhang et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2015), proliferation (PCNA and Ki67), reactive oxygen species (HO1) and glucose and fatty acid uptake (GLUT1, GLUT4, FATP1 and CPT1; Gentili et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2013; Nicholas et al. 2014) were measured by quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR (qRT‐PCR) (Table 1) using Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on a ViiA7 Fast Real‐time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) as previously described (Wang et al. 2011; Soo et al. 2012; McGillick et al. 2013).

Table 1.

Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR for maternal cardiac tissues

Accession no. Gene Forward (F) and reverse (R) primer sequences
NM_001160026.1 BNP F: CCTGCTTCTCCTCTTCTTGC
R: TAGACGGTCCAACAGCTCCT
X55152 TNFα F: ACACCATGAGCACCAAAAGC
R: AGGCACCAGCAACTTCTGGA
NM_001009465.2 IL1β F: TGCCTACGAACATGTCTTCCGTGA
R: TGCTCTCTGTCCTGGAGTTTGCAT
NM_001034494.1 PCNA F: ACTCCACTGTCTCCTACAGTAA
R: CGATCTTGGGAGCCAAATAGT
XM_005197116.1 Ki67 F: TCAGTGAGCAGGAGGCAGTA
R: GGAAATCCAGGTGACTTGCT
NM_001014912.1 HO 1 F: CTGGTGATGGCGTCTTTGTA
R: CAGCTCCTCTGGGAAGTAGA

Fetal lung phenotype

Tissue was sampled from the left caudal lobe of the fetal lung, avoiding large airways and blood vessels, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted and qRT‐PCR was used to measure gene expression under optimised primer‐specific conditions as described previously (Westover & Moss, 2012), using 1 μg of RNA with Superscript III First Strand Synthesis system kit for real‐time PCR, as specified by the manufacturer (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Gene primers for surfactant protein (SP) ‐A, ‐B, ‐C and ‐D and cytokines (interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8 and IL‐10) were as previously published (Wallace et al. 2009; Westover et al. 2012), and for IL‐10 primer sequences were F (forward): GCTGTCATCGTTTTCTGCCC; R (reverse): CTCTCTTCACCTGCTCCACC). Rps29 rRNA was used as the reference gene because its levels were stable across fetal lung samples, and it was amplified using the primers F: CAGGGTTCTCGCTCTTGC and R: ACTGGCGGCACATATTGAG. Messenger RNA levels were normalised to expression of the reference gene Rps29 rRNA for each fetus, and gene expression in fetuses from the allergic group was expressed relative to the mean mRNA abundance for that gene in the control fetuses.

Statistical analyses

Continuous outcomes in control and allergic sheep were compared by one‐way ANOVA.

Changes in R L were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA for effects of gestational age and treatment. Immune cell percentages in BAL pre‐ and post‐challenge, in allergic and control sheep, and across gestational ages were compared by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparisons test. Relative mRNA levels between groups were compared using non‐paired t tests. Statistical tests were performed using SPSS version 21 and data are presented as means ± SEM.

Results

Maternal immune responses to challenge

Prior to mating and in late pregnancy, BAL samples collected before the airway challenge (0 h) from control and allergic sheep comprised similar proportions of macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils (Fig. 2). In allergic sheep, the proportion of eosinophils in BAL increased markedly 48 h after airway allergen challenge at each time point (each P < 0.01), whilst eosinophil proportions did not rise after saline challenge in control sheep (Fig. 2). In late pregnancy, macrophages formed a greater proportion of immune cells in BAL collected pre‐challenge, in allergic compared to control sheep (P < 0.05, Fig. 2). After challenge in late pregnancy, eosinophils formed a greater proportion of immune cells in BAL and macrophages formed a lower proportion of immune cells in BAL, in allergic compared to control sheep (each P < 0.001, Fig. 2). In allergic sheep in late pregnancy, the proportions of eosinophils increased in post‐challenge compared to pre‐challenge BAL samples (P < 0.001), whilst the proportions of macrophages decreased (P < 0.001, Fig. 2). The abundance of neutrophils in BAL was lower in pregnant compared to non‐pregnant sheep overall (P < 0.05, Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Immune cell populations in BAL fluid before and 48 h after airway challenge .

Figure 2

Data are numbers of macrophages (A), lymphocytes (B), neutrophils (C) and eosinophils (D) as a proportion of all immune cells and are shown as means ± SEM. Control animals are shown in open bars, and allergic animals in filled bars, samples collected prior to airway challenge are in plain bars and samples collected 48 h after airway challenge are in hatched bars. Differences between control and allergic animals at the same time relative to challenge are shown by *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001; differences between pre‐ and 48 h post‐challenge values within a group at each gestational age are shown by $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01 and $$$ P < 0.001; overall differences between gestational ages are indicated by ^ P < 0.05.

There was no difference in the numbers or proportions (%) of immune cell types in peripheral blood when examined prior to airway challenge in control versus allergic sheep before mating or in late pregnancy (data not shown). In allergic sheep in late pregnancy, there was a decline in the percentage of lymphocytes and monocytes, and a corresponding increase in eosinophils, in peripheral blood at 48 h after airway allergen challenge compared to pre‐challenge, but these proportions did not change with gestation in control sheep (data not shown).

Maternal physiological responses to challenge

There was no change in R L after saline challenge in controls in early or late gestation (Fig. 3). HDM allergen challenge increased R L (relative to baseline R L) throughout gestation in 6 of the 7 allergic sheep. The increase in R L in allergic sheep was greater in mid‐ and late pregnancy compared to early pregnancy (Fig. 3, P < 0.05). In late pregnancy, airway responses to HDM challenge in allergic sheep were greater than the response to saline challenge in control sheep (Fig. 3, P < 0.01).

Figure 3. Responses to airway challenge in pregnancy .

Figure 3

Mean percentage change from baseline lung resistance (R L) in allergic sheep challenged with HDM (filled circles) and control sheep challenged with saline (open circles), at early, mid and late stages in pregnancy. Results for each time point represent the group mean of the maximum change in resistance over the first 30 min after challenge. Differences between control and allergic animals at the same gestational age are shown by **P < 0.01. Difference in allergic animals at late pregnancy compared to early pregnancy is shown by ^ P < 0.05.

Maternal outcomes at post mortem

Morphometric image analysis of maternal lung revealed significant increases in airway smooth muscle accumulation around the airways in allergic compared to control pregnant sheep, without significant changes in collagen deposition (P = 0.056, Fig. 4). Chronic HDM challenge of the airways in allergic pregnant sheep did not alter total mast cell numbers within the parenchyma and airway wall (Fig. 4 E and F), nor the numbers of degranulated mast cells within the airway walls (controls: 0.15 ± 0.03 cells (mm BM)−1; allergic: 0.72 ± 0.29 cells (mm BM)−1, P = 0.093).

Figure 4. Maternal lung tissue sections stained with Masson's trichrome in control (A) and allergic pregnant sheep (B), showing collagen (blue stained areas) and airway smooth muscle (black arrows) staining .

Figure 4

Image analysis of Masson's trichrome‐stained lung sections for the quantification of airway smooth muscle (ASM; C) and collagen content (D) relative to basement membrane (BM) length. Anti‐tryptase mast cell+ staining (white arrows; degranulated mast cells indicated with open arrows) in lung tissue of control (E) and allergic pregnant sheep (F), with cell counts presented in airway parenchyma (G) and within the airway wall (H). Differences between control and allergic animals are shown by **P < 0.01. Quantitative data are presented as data from individual animals for control (open circles) and allergic (filled circles) sheep, with means ± SEM (n = 5/group).

Maternal body weight and absolute and relative organ weights did not differ between control and allergic sheep (Table 2, Fig. 5 A). Maternal cardiac expression of genes involved in physiological and pathological hypertrophy, cortisol availability, inflammation, fibrosis, proliferation, glucose uptake and reactive oxygen stress also did not differ between groups (Table 3).

Table 2.

Maternal body and organ weights at post mortem

Control (n = 5) Allergic (n = 7)
Body weight (kg) 38.9 ± 2.1 39.6 ± 1.4
Lung (g) 517 ± 106 476 ± 31
Lung (%) 1.27 ± 0.19 1.23 ± 0.09
Heart (g) 169 ± 8 176 ± 4
Heart (%) 0.436 ± 0.014 0.447 ± 0.016
Right ventricle (g) 35.4 ± 2.3 37.4 ± 1.2
Left ventricle (g) 61.2 ± 2.6 66.1 ± 3.7
Liver (g) 597 ± 47 560 ± 24
Liver (%) 1.50 ± 0.04 1.41 ± 0.03
Kidneys (g) 100 ± 4 109 ± 7
Kidneys (%) 0.257 ± 0.007 0.275 ± 0.013
Spleen (g) 129 ± 19 135 ± 26
Spleen (%) 0.334 ± 0.052 0.344 ± 0.071
Visceral fat (g) 418 ± 90 514 ± 92
Visceral fat (%) 1.07 ± 0.22 1.29 ± 0.21

Data are means ± SEM. Unless otherwise noted, organ weights given as % are relative to maternal body weight.

Figure 5. Effect of maternal allergic asthma on maternal body weight (A), absolute fetal body weight (B) and fetal body weight (relative to maternal weight) (C) at ∼140 dGA .

Figure 5

Quantitative data are presented as data from individual animals for control (open circles) and allergic (filled circles) sheep, with mean ± SEM shown in bars. Differences between control and allergic animals are shown by *P < 0.05.

Table 3.

Mean normalised expression of molecules that regulate cardiac growth and metabolism in control and asthmatic ewes in late gestation

Control (n = 5) Allergic (n = 7)
Physiological hypertrophy
IGF1 0.058 ± 0.001 0.077 ± 0.015
IGF2 1.211 ± 0.102 1.200 ± 0.056
IGF1R 0.501 ± 0.010 0.480 ± 0.034
Pathological hypertrophy
ANP 7.422 ± 4.696 0.485 ± 0.106
BNP 1.908 ± 1.161 0.356 ± 0.172
IGF2R 0.231 ± 0.012 0.257 ± 0.026
AT1R 0.044 ± 0.004 0.037 ± 0.003
Cortisol availability
GR 0.535 ± 0.030 0.453 ± 0.027
MR 0.108 ± 0.003 0.100 ± 0.005
11βHSD1 0.015 ± 0.002 0.014 ± 0.001
11βHSD2 0.0009 ± 0.0002 0.0013 ± 0.0002
Inflammation
TNFα 0.020 ± 0.005 0.016 ± 0.004
IL1β 0.011 ± 0.003 0.006 ± 0.001
Fibrosis
TGFβ 0.212 ± 0.046 0.284 ± 0.074
Collagen type II 0.003 ± 0.001 0.002 ± 0.001
MMP2 0.104 ± 0.012 0.083 ± 0.004
TIMP1 0.259 ± 0.039 0.208 ± 0.022
TIMP2 0.179 ± 0.007 0.214 ± 0.018
TIMP3 0.852 ± 0.089 0.955 ± 0.067
Proliferation
PCNA 0.078 ± 0.005 0.072 ± 0.002
Ki67 0.006± 0.002 0.004 ± 0.001
Glucose uptake
GLUT1 0.008 ± 0.001 0.011 ± 0.002
GLUT4 0.199 ± 0.014 0.269 ± 0.027
Reactive oxygen stress
HO1 0.050 ± 0.008 0.044 ± 0.005

Data are mean normalised expression ± SEM.

Placental and fetal outcomes at post mortem

Total placental weight, the number of placentomes and average placentome weight did not differ between groups (Table 4), but there were differences in placental phenotype. Whilst placentae from allergic ewes had similar absolute numbers of Type A (P = 0.070), Type B (P = 0.076) and Type C (P = 0.073) placentomes (Fig. 6 A) compared to placentae of control ewes, Type B (P = 0.037) and Type C (P = 0.047) placentomes formed greater proportions of total placentome numbers in the allergic group (Fig. 6 B). Additionally, the total weight of Type A placentomes was lower in placentae from allergic than in those from control ewes (Fig. 6 C).

Table 4.

Placental phenotype and fetal size and organ weights at post mortem

Control (n = 5) Allergic (n = 7)
Placenta
 Placental weight 344 ± 51 323 ± 23
 Total placentomes (no.) 76.4 ± 6.5 73.7 ± 4.7
 Average placentome weight (g) 4.39 ± 0.37 4.40 ± 0.21
Fetal weight and size at post mortem
 Body weight (kg) 4.11 ± 0.28 3.69 ± 0.14
 Crown–rump length (cm) 57.2 ± 0.9 56.1 ± 1.0
 Abdominal circ. (cm) 35.0 ± 1.2 33.0 ± 0.7
 Thoracic circ. (cm) 33.7 ± 1.0 32.1 ± 0.5
 Head length (cm) 12.9 ± 0.4 13.3 ± 0.4
 Head width (cm) 9.2 ± 0.1 9.4 ± 0.3
Fetal organ weights at post mortem
 Lung (g) 137 ± 12 137 ± 7
 Lung (%) 3.22 ± 0.14 3.72 ± 0.20
 Brain (g) 59.1 ± 1.0 57.3 ± 1.4
 Brain (%) 1.46 ± 0.10 1.56 ± 0.05
 Liver (g) 96.7 ± 11.1 86.9 ± 5.8
 Liver (%) 2.33 ± 0.12 2.35 ± 0.10
 Heart (g) 27.7 ± 1.8 25.3 ± 1.2
 Heart (%) 0.674 ± 0.019 0.686 ± 0.022
 Kidneys (g) 24.0 ± 2.1 23.3 ± 0.9
 Kidneys (%) 0.582 ± 0.026 0.631 ± 0.012
 Spleen (g) 5.93 ± 0.78 6.07 ± 0.48
 Spleen (%) 0.144 ± 0.016 0.164 ± 0.012
 Visceral fat (g) 24.2 ± 3.2 23.7 ± 0.8
 Visceral fat (%) 0.580 ± 0.041 0.644 ± 0.016

Data are means ± SEM. Unless otherwise noted, organ weights given as % are relative to fetal body weight. circ., circumference.

Figure 6. Effect of maternal allergic asthma on placental phenotype .

Figure 6

Data are means ± SEM. Differences between control and allergic animals are shown by *P < 0.05.

Absolute measures of fetal weight (−10% in allergic cf. control group) and size did not differ between treatments (Table 2, Fig. 5 B). However, fetal weight relative to maternal weight was 12% lower in the allergic group (P = 0.038, Fig. 5 C). The singleton fetuses collected at post mortem comprised two males and three females from control ewes, and three males and four females from allergic ewes.

Fetal lung gene expression

Maternal allergy decreased fetal lung gene expression of SP‐B (P = 0.045), but not SP‐A, SP‐C or SP‐D (P = 0.053) expression (Fig. 7 A). Expression of IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8 and IL‐10 did not differ between fetuses of control and allergic ewes (Fig. 7 B).

Figure 7. Effect of maternal allergic asthma (filled bars) on mRNA levels of surfactant proteins A, B, C and D (A) and cytokines IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8 and IL‐10 (B) in fetal lung .

Figure 7

Data are presented as means ± SEM, expressed relative to the control group (open bars) at each age. All data are corrected for the expression level of the reference gene Rps29. Differences between control and allergic animals are shown by *P < 0.05.

Discussion

We have established a sheep model of maternal asthma in pregnancy, which demonstrates effects on maternal lung function, fetal and placental growth and lung development that are consistent with effects of maternal asthma in humans. The alterations in maternal inflammation and lung morphology and function seen in response to HDM exposure indicated that an allergic phenotype of asthma was induced in the pregnant ewes. Fetal body weight (relative to maternal weight) was 12% lower in asthmatic sheep pregnancies compared to controls, consistent with the magnitude of fetal growth restriction observed in the presence of maternal asthma in human pregnancy (Murphy et al. 2011; Namazy et al. 2013; Mendola et al. 2014). Placental phenotype in late pregnancy was altered, consistent with accelerated maturation of the placenta (Alexander, 1964), suggesting placental adaptation to compensate for impaired nutrient and/or oxygen supply in asthmatic pregnancies. Maternal asthma also decreased expression of surfactant proteins in fetal lung, which would be expected to impair neonatal lung function. These data provide novel insights into the impact of maternal lung allergy on fetal–placental physiology and suggest this model may be important for discovering the mechanisms underlying the association of maternal asthma with greater risks of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN) in human babies (Mendola et al. 2014).

The current data suggest maternal allergic asthma in sheep has specific effects on lung surfactant production. SP‐B gene expression was reduced in fetuses from allergic pregnancies in the present study, with similar trends for SP‐A, ‐C and ‐D, suggesting delayed maturation of the pulmonary surfactant system. Surfactant deficiency is the principal cause of RDS and contributes to the pathogenesis of TTN (Moss, 2006; Machado et al. 2011). RDS and TTN are common complications of prematurity, but in infants from asthmatic mothers the risk is elevated even after adjustment for gestational age (Mendola et al. 2014). These effects do not appear to be induced by fetal lung inflammation, because fetal lung expression of inflammatory cytokines was not elevated in our model of maternal allergic asthma. It has been speculated that associations between maternal asthma and risk of RDS and TTN might relate to genetic factors associated with asthma (Machado et al. 2011), but our findings show that maternal allergic asthma per se impairs development of the fetal lungs.

The impact of maternal allergic asthma on fetal weights in the sheep model is similar to the human data and suggests the sheep model will be important in defining the growth mechanisms altered by maternal asthma. There were 10% and 12% reductions in absolute and relative fetal weights, respectively, in response to maternal allergic asthma, which is consistent with findings in human studies (Murphy et al. 2003). Numerous epidemiological analyses report that asthmatic mothers are at an increased risk of delivering a low birth weight infant, in particular when the asthma is severe, poorly controlled or acute exacerbations are experienced during gestation (Murphy et al. 2003, 2005, 2006, 2011; Namazy et al. 2013; Mendola et al. 2014). Several studies in human pregnancy indicate that the fetal response to maternal asthma was dependent on fetal sex. Thus, in the presence of maternal asthma, there was a ∼12% reduction in female birth weight when compared to female neonates from non‐asthmatic mothers, while there was no difference in birth weight of male infants overall (Murphy et al. 2003). Critically, if the mother experienced an exacerbation during pregnancy then birth weight of male fetuses was decreased dramatically, with an associated rise in the rates of IUGR, preterm deliveries and stillbirths, whilst exacerbations did not have any further impact on birth weight in females (Murphy et al. 2005). These findings suggest males and females respond differently to maternal asthma and implement different strategies in relation to growth. Other perinatal exposures, including experimentally induced IUGR or preterm birth, maternal antenatal glucocorticoid treatment or hypoxia, and fetal interventions such as treatment with insulin‐like growth factor 1, induce sex‐specific acute and long‐term responses in sheep (Owens et al. 2007; Gentili et al. 2009; Lumbers et al. 2009; De Matteo et al. 2010; Tang et al. 2010; Giussani et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2011, 2013; Miller et al. 2012; Wooldridge et al. 2014; Poudel et al. 2015). The current study was not powered to examine sex differences, and additional studies will be required to assess whether responses to maternal asthma are also sex‐dependent in sheep in order to determine the underlying mechanisms.

The placenta plays a central role in modulating fetal growth and development and has been previously shown to be altered in human pregnancies complicated by asthma (Clifton, 2010). We demonstrated a significant alteration in placental phenotype in the presence of maternal allergic asthma in this sheep model. The increased proportion of Type B and C placentomes in the presence of maternal allergic asthma in sheep is suggestive of a more mature placental phenotype (Alexander, 1964). The shift towards Type B and Type C placentomes in response to maternal asthma in the present study is similar to the enhanced placental maturation observed in late gestation following interventions that reduce fetal growth in early gestation in sheep. For example, restriction of fetal nutrient supply by surgical reductions in uterine epithelial attachment sites before mating (and hence placentome number throughout pregnancy), increases the proportion of Type D placentomes in late gestation (Robinson et al. 1979; Poudel et al. 2015). Maternal or fetal hypoxia are also associated with a significant change in placentome distribution with fewer Type A and more Types B, C and D (Penninga & Longo, 1998). Maternal undernutrition in early to mid‐pregnancy (ewes fed 50% of requirements from 28 to 77 dGA) reduces the proportion of Type A and increases the proportion of Type B placentomes present near term in sheep (Heasman et al. 1998), and milder maternal undernutrition (ewes fed 85% of requirements for the first 70 days after mating) shifts placental phenotype from Type A towards Type D placentomes (Steyn et al. 2001). Thus, placental changes induced by maternal asthma probably represent an adaptation to increase placental transfer capacity and maintain fetal growth in the face of reduced oxygen supply or inflammation. The functional significance of these phenotypic changes is the subject of some debate and merits direct study; measures of cell number, vascularity and vasoreactivity are more closely related to placentome size than type (Vonnahme et al. 2008) and placental nutrient delivery did not correlate with the proportions of Types C and D placentomes in sheep near term (Ward et al. 2006). Further studies will define the role of these placental phenotypes in regulating fetal growth and survival in the presence of the maternal lung allergy.

Similar to our previous work in non‐pregnant sheep (Bischof et al. 2003; Snibson et al. 2005; Meeusen et al. 2009), 55% of animals were responsive to HDM sensitisation, showing elevation of HDM‐specific IgE. Our work shows that conception rates are not affected by HDM sensitisation. These sheep subsequently exhibited symptoms consistent with allergic asthma, including an increase in systemic allergen‐specific IgE levels, increased circulating and airway (BAL) eosinophils, decreased lung function and features of airway wall remodelling, but no changes in cardiac gene expression. Similar immune responses and structural changes are typical of the human asthmatic lung (James et al. 2012), though data from human pregnancies complicated by asthma are limited to lung function and circulating immune cells (Murphy et al. 2003; Osei‐Kumah et al. 2010). In allergic sheep, the inflammatory response to HDM challenge in the lung worsened as pregnancy progressed, with increasing eosinophil induction in response to each challenge, and lung function continued to decline with repeated allergen exposures during pregnancy. Direct comparisons of pregnant and non‐pregnant animals during the same sensitisation and airway challenge regimes are needed to confirm whether this is a pregnancy‐induced worsening of asthma, as occurs in human asthma during pregnancy (Murphy et al. 2005). Interestingly, other studies suggest maternal asthma worsens in relation to the sex of the fetus and in particular in the presence of a female fetus. Previous studies report a higher incidence of maternal hospitalisations for asthma in women pregnant with a female (Bakhireva et al. 2008) and reduced maternal lung function and increased requirement for inhaled corticosteroids in women pregnant with a female (Murphy et al. 2003), compared to women carrying a male fetus. However, this remains controversial as a large epidemiological study of over 11,000 pregnancies did not find any difference in maternal exacerbations or daily inhaled corticosteroid dose between asthmatic women pregnant with a male or female fetus (Firoozi et al. 2009). The sheep model of maternal allergic asthma will allow us to directly compare male and female asthmatic pregnancies in future, larger studies.

Our development and validation of this new and unique model of allergic asthma in pregnancy lays the foundation for future studies focused on understanding mechanisms through which maternal asthma during pregnancy increases the risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. This model also provides the opportunity to test interventions that may prevent adverse outcomes of asthma in pregnancy by evaluating treatment responses in the mother and fetus and assessing the short and long‐term effects of asthma treatments on the offspring. A major strength of this model is that fetal sheep can be instrumented for physiological studies throughout the final third of gestation. The establishment of this model of maternal allergic asthma in the sheep will therefore enable detailed fetal physiological responses to asthma, exacerbations, clinical treatments and novel interventions to be assessed in detail.

Additional information

Competing interests

No authors have competing interests in relation to this work.

Author contributions

V.L.C., T.J.M.M., K.L.G., A.L.W., M.J.W., J.L.M., B.S.M., R.DeM. and R.J.B. were central to the conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published. B.L., D.K. and A.D. were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data and final approval of the version to be published. The experiments were carried out at the Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Funding

This work was supported by the Jack Brockhoff Foundation (Grant no. 3699 to R.J.B., T.J.M.M., K.L.G., J.L.M., R.DeM., V.L.C., B.S.M. and M.J.W.) and the Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program (T.J.M.M., M.J.W., R.J.B.). T.J.M.M. (APP1043294) and V.L.C. (APP1041918) are supported by NHMRC Senior Research Fellowships, and J.L.M. (APP1066916) and B.S.M. (APP1042111) are supported by NHMRC Career Development Fellowships. A.L.W. and B.L. are supported by Australian Postgraduate Awards from the Australian Government, and A.L.W. by a Healthy Development Adelaide Scholarship.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Monash Animal Services for care of animals, and Stacey Homan, Hui Lu, Gary Nguyen, Monerih Jamali, Stefanie Agostino, Anqi Li and Pamela Sim for assisting with airway challenges, sample collections, post mortems and real‐time PCR.

References

  1. Agache I, Akdis C, Jutel M & Virchow JC (2012). Untangling asthma phenotypes and endotypes. Allergy 67, 835–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander GR (1964). Studies on the placenta of the sheep (Ovis aries L.). Placental size. J Reprod Fertil 7, 289–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen IC (2009). Searching for an improved mouse model of allergic airway disease using dual allergen exposures. Dis Model Mech 2, 519–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012). Australian Health Survey: First Results, 2011–12. (Cat. no. 4364.0.55.001). Canberra, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhireva LN, Schatz M, Jones KL, Tucker CM, Slymen DJ, Klonoff‐Cohen HS, Gresham L, Johnson D & Chambers CD; OTIS Collaborative Research Group. (2008). Fetal sex and maternal asthma control in pregnancy. J Asthma 45, 403–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bischof RJ, Snibson K, Shaw R & Meeusen ENT (2003). Induction of allergic inflammation in the lungs of sensitized sheep after local challenge with house dust mite. Clin Exp Allergy 33, 367–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bischof RJ, Snibson KJ, Van Der Velden J & Meeusen ENT (2008). Immune response to allergens in sheep sensitized to house dust mite. J Inflamm (Lond) 5, 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bousquet J, Mantzouranis E, Cruz AA, Ait‐Khaled N, Baena‐Cagnani CE, Bleecker ER, Brightling CE, Burney P, Bush A, Busse WW, Casale TB, Chan‐Yeung M, Chen R, Chowdhury B, Chung KF, Dahl R, Drazen JM, Fabbri LM, Holgate ST, Kauffmann F, Haahtela T, Khaltaev N, Kiley JP, Masjedi MR, Mohammad Y, O'Byrne P, Partridge MR, Rabe KF, Togias A, van Weel C, Wenzel S, Zhong N & Zuberbier T (2010). Uniform definition of asthma severity, control, and exacerbations: document presented for the World Health Organization Consultation on Severe Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126, 926–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calderón MA, Linneberg A, Kleine‐Tebbe J, De Blay F, Hernandez Fernandez de Rojas D, Virchow JC & Demoly P (2015). Respiratory allergy caused by house dust mites: What do we really know? J Allergy Clin Immunol 136, 38–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clifton VL (2010). Review: Sex and the human placenta: Mediating differential strategies of fetal growth and survival. Placenta 31, Suppl., S33–S39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clifton VL, Engel P, Smith R, Gibson P, Brinsmead M & Giles WB (2009). Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by asthma in an Australian population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49, 619–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Collie DD (2003). Comparative, complementary and relevant: the immunological basis of ovine lung allergic responses. Clin Exp Allergy 33, 282–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cook‐Mills JM (2015). Maternal influences over offspring allergic responses. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 15, 501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Matteo R, Blasch N, Stokes V, Davis P & Harding R (2010). Induced preterm birth in sheep: a suitable model for studying the developmental effects of moderately preterm birth. Reprod Sci 17, 724–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Duffield JA, Vuocolo T, Tellam R, McFarlane JR, Kauter KG, Muhlhausler BS & McMillen IC (2009). Intrauterine growth restriction and the sex specific programming of leptin and peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ) mRNA expression in visceral fat in the lamb. Pediatr Res 66, 59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Firoozi F, Ducharme FM, Lemiere C, Beauchesne MF, Perreault S, Forget A & Blais L (2009). Effect of fetal gender on maternal asthma exacerbations in pregnant asthmatic women. Respir Med 103, 144–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gandhi VD, Davidson C, Asaduzzaman M, Nahirney D & Vliagoftis H (2013). House dust mite interactions with airway epithelium: role in allergic airway inflammation. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 13, 262–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gentili S, Morrison JL & McMillen IC (2009). Intrauterine growth restriction and differential patterns of hepatic growth and expression of IGF1, PCK2, and HSDL1 mRNA in the sheep fetus in late gestation. Biol Reprod 80, 1121–1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Giussani DA, Fletcher AJ & Gardner DS (2011). Sex differences in the ovine fetal cortisol response to stress. Pediatr Res 69, 118–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gunn AJ, Gunn TR, de Haan HH, Williams CE & Gluckman PD (1997). Dramatic neuronal rescue with prolonged selective head cooling after ischemia in fetal lambs. J Clin Invest 99, 248–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heasman L, Clarke L, Firth K, Stephenson T & Symonds ME (1998). Influence of restricted maternal nutrition in early to mid gestation on placental and fetal development at term in sheep. Pediatr Res 44, 546–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F & Vandesompele J (2007). qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real‐time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8, R19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hellemans J & Vandesompele J (2014). Selection of reliable reference genes for RT‐qPCR analysis. Methods Mol Biol 1160, 19–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hodyl NA, Stark MJ, Scheil W, Grzeskowiak LE & Clifton VL (2014). Perinatal outcomes following maternal asthma and cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Eur Respir J 43, 704–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hylkema MN & Blacquiere MJ (2009). Intrauterine effects of maternal smoking on sensitization, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 6, 660–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. James AL, Elliot JG, Jones RL, Carroll ML, Mauad T, Bai TR, Abramson MJ, McKay KO & Green FH (2012). Airway smooth muscle hypertrophy and hyperplasia in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185, 1058–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kao DP, Hsich E & Lindenfeld J (2013). Characteristics, adverse events, and racial differences among delivering mothers with peripartum cardiomyopathy. JACC Heart Fail 1, 409–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Koumoundouros E, Bischof RJ, Meeusen EN, Mareels IM & Snibson KJ (2006). Chronic airway disease: deteriorating pulmonary function in sheep associated with repeated challenges of house dust mite. Exp Lung Res 32, 321–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lie S, Hui M, McMillen IC, Muhlhausler BS, Posterino GS, Dunn SL, Wang KC, Botting KJ & Morrison JL (2014). Exposure to rosiglitazone, a PPAR‐γ agonist, in late gestation reduces the abundance of factors regulating cardiac metabolism and cardiomyocyte size in the sheep fetus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 306, R429–R437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lie S, Sim SM, McMillen IC, Williams‐Wyss O, MacLaughlin SM, Kleemann DO, Walker SK, Roberts CT & Morrison JL (2013). Maternal undernutrition around the time of conception and embryo number each impact on the abundance of key regulators of cardiac growth and metabolism in the fetal sheep heart. J Dev Orig Health Dis 4, 377–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liggins GC (1969). Premature delivery of foetal lambs infused with glucocorticoids. J Endocrinol 45, 515–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lumbers ER, Kim MY, Burrell JH, Kumarasamy V, Boyce AC, Gibson KJ, Gatford KL & Owens JA (2009). Effects of intrafetal IGF‐I on growth of cardiac myocytes in late‐gestation fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296, E513–E519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McGillick EV, Orgeig S, McMillen IC & Morrison JL (2013). The fetal sheep lung does not respond to cortisol infusion during the late canalicular phase of development. Physiol Rep 1, e00130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Machado LU, Fiori HH, Baldisserotto M, Ramos Garcia PC, Vieira AC & Fiori RM (2011). Surfactant deficiency in transient tachypnea of the newborn. J Pediatr 159, 750–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Meeusen EN, Snibson KJ, Hirst SJ & Bischof RJ (2009). Sheep as a model species for the study and treatment of human asthma and other respiratory diseases. Drug Discov Today Dis Models 6, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mendola P, Mannisto TI, Leishear K, Reddy UM, Chen Z & Laughon SK (2014). Neonatal health of infants born to mothers with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 133, 85–90.e1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller SL, Sutherland AE, Supramaniam VG, Walker DW, Jenkin G & Wallace EM (2012). Antenatal glucocorticoids reduce growth in appropriately grown and growth‐restricted ovine fetuses in a sex‐specific manner. Reprod Fertil Dev 24, 753–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moss TJ (2006). Respiratory consequences of preterm birth. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 33, 280–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moss TJM, Doherty DA, Nitsos I, Harding R & Newnham JP (2003). Pharmacokinetics of betamethasone after maternal or fetal intramuscular administration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189, 1751–1757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Murphy VE, Clifton VL & Gibson PG (2006). Asthma exacerbations during pregnancy: incidence and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thorax 61, 169–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Murphy VE, Gibson P, Talbot PI & Clifton VL (2005). Severe asthma exacerbations during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 106, 1046–1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Murphy VE, Gibson PG, Giles WB, Zakar T, Smith R, Bisits AM, Kessell CG & Clifton VL (2003). Maternal asthma is associated with reduced female fetal growth. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168, 1317–1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Murphy VE, Namazy JA, Powell H, Schatz M, Chambers C, Attia J & Gibson PG (2011). A meta‐analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma. BJOG 118, 1314–1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Namazy JA, Murphy VE, Powell H, Gibson PG, Chambers C & Schatz M (2013). Effects of asthma severity, exacerbations and oral corticosteroids on perinatal outcomes. Eur Respir J 41, 1082–1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (2013). Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, 8th edn Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nicholas LM, Rattanatray L, Morrison JL, Kleemann DO, Walker SK, Zhang S, MacLaughlin S & McMillen IC (2014). Maternal obesity or weight loss around conception impacts hepatic fatty acid metabolism in the offspring. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22, 1685–1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Osei‐Kumah A, Wark PA, Smith R & Clifton VL (2010). Asthma during pregnancy alters immune cell profile and airway epithelial chemokine release. Inflamm Res 59, 349–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Owens JA, Thavaneswaran P, De Blasio MJ, McMillen IC, Robinson JS & Gatford KL (2007). Sex‐specific effects of placental restriction on components of the metabolic syndrome in young adult sheep. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292, E1879–E1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Passmore M, Nataatmadja M & Fraser JF (2009). Selection of reference genes for normalisation of real‐time RT‐PCR in brain‐stem death injury in Ovis aries . BMC Mol Biol 10, 72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Penninga L & Longo LD (1998). Ovine placentome morphology: effect of high altitude, long‐term hypoxia. Placenta 19, 187–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Poudel R, McMillen IC, Dunn SL, Zhang S & Morrison JL (2015). Impact of chronic hypoxemia on blood flow to the brain, heart, and adrenal gland in the late‐gestation IUGR sheep fetus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 308, R151–R162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Robinson JS, Kingston EJ, Jones CT & Thorburn GD (1979). Studies on experimental growth retardation in sheep. The effect of removal of endometrial caruncles on fetal size and metabolism. J Dev Physiol 1, 379–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Roelfsema V, Bennet L, George S, Wu D, Guan J, Veerman M & Gunn AJ (2004). Window of opportunity of cerebral hypothermia for postischemic white matter injury in the near‐term fetal sheep. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 24, 877–886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schindelin J, Arganda‐Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P & Cardona A (2012). Fiji: an open‐source platform for biological‐image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sharma S, Lackie PM & Holgate ST (2003). Uneasy breather: the implications of dust mite allergens. Clin Exp Allergy 33, 163–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Snibson KJ, Bischof RJ, Slocombe RF & Meeusen EN (2005). Airway remodelling and inflammation in sheep lungs after chronic airway challenge with house dust mite. Clin Exp Allergy 35, 146–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Soo PS, Hiscock J, Botting KJ, Roberts CT, Davey AK & Morrison JL (2012). Maternal undernutrition reduces P‐glycoprotein in guinea pig placenta and developing brain in late gestation. Reprod Toxicol 33, 374–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Steyn C, Hawkins P, Saito T, Noakes DE, Kingdom JC & Hanson MA (2001). Undernutrition during the first half of gestation increases the predominance of fetal tissue in late‐gestation ovine placentomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 98, 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tang L, Bi J, Valego N, Carey L, Figueroa J, Chappell M & Rose JC (2010). Prenatal betamethasone exposure alters renal function in immature sheep: sex differences in effects. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 299, R793–R803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A & Speleman F (2002). Accurate normalization of real‐time quantitative RT‐PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3, RESEARCH0034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vatnick I, Schoknecht PA, Darrigrand R & Bell AW (1991). Growth and metabolism of the placenta after unilateral fetectomy in twin pregnant ewes. J Dev Physiol 15, 351–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vonnahme KA, Arndt WJ, Johnson ML, Borowicz PP & Reynolds LP (2008). Effect of morphology on placentome size, vascularity, and vasoreactivity in late pregnant sheep. Biol Reprod 79, 976–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wallace MJ, Probyn ME, Zahra VA, Crossley K, Cole TJ, Davis PG, Morley CJ & Hooper SB (2009). Early biomarkers and potential mediators of ventilation‐induced lung injury in very preterm lambs. Respir Res 10, 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang KC, Brooks DA, Summers‐Pearce B, Bobrovskaya L, Tosh DN, Duffield JA, Botting KJ, Zhang S, Caroline McMillen I & Morrison JL (2015). Low birth weight activates the renin‐angiotensin system, but limits cardiac angiogenesis in early postnatal life. Physiol Rep 3, e12270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang KC, Lim CH, McMillen IC, Duffield JA, Brooks DA & Morrison JL (2013). Alteration of cardiac glucose metabolism in association to low birth weight: experimental evidence in lambs with left ventricular hypertrophy. Metabolism 62, 1662–1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang KC, Zhang L, McMillen IC, Botting KJ, Duffield JA, Zhang S, Suter CM, Brooks DA & Morrison JL (2011). Fetal growth restriction and the programming of heart growth and cardiac insulin‐like growth factor 2 expression in the lamb. J Physiol 589, 4709–4722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ward JW, Forhead AJ, Wooding FB & Fowden AL (2006). Functional significance and cortisol dependence of the gross morphology of ovine placentomes during late gestation. Biol Reprod 74, 137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Westover AJ, Hooper SB, Wallace MJ & Moss TJ (2012). Prostaglandins mediate the fetal pulmonary response to intrauterine inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 302, L664–L678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Westover AJ & Moss TJ (2012). Effects of intrauterine infection or inflammation on fetal lung development. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 39, 824–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wooldridge AL, Bischof RJ, Meeusen EN, Liu H, Heinemann GK, Hunter DS, Giles LC, Kind KL, Owens JA, Clifton VL & Gatford KL (2014). Placental restriction of fetal growth reduces cutaneous responses to antigen after sensitization in sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 306, R441–R446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang S, Morrison JL, Gill A, Rattanatray L, MacLaughlin SM, Kleemann D, Walker SK & McMillen IC (2013). Dietary restriction in the periconceptional period in normal‐weight or obese ewes results in increased abundance of angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) in the absence of changes in ACE or AT1R methylation in the adrenal of the offspring. Reproduction 146, 443–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang S, Rattanatray L, MacLaughlin SM, Cropley JE, Suter CM, Molloy L, Kleemann D, Walker SK, Muhlhausler BS, Morrison JL & McMillen IC (2010). Periconceptional undernutrition in normal and overweight ewes leads to increased adrenal growth and epigenetic changes in adrenal IGF2/H19 gene in offspring. FASEB J 24, 2772–2782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES