Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 29;11(2):e0150264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150264

Table 2. In vitro and in vivo developmental rates of prepubertal and adult oocytes cultured pre- and during IVM with or without cAMP modulators.

Donors Treatment Replicates (n) Total retrieved oocytes Total IVM oocytes Cleavage rates/IVM oocytes (%)* Blastocysts rates/IVM oocytes (%)* Embryo transfer (n) Pregnancy at 45 d, n(%) Pregnancy at 90 d, n(%) Pregnancy at 180 d, n(%)
Prepubertal cAMP30 18 352 217 57.1±5.2 18.3±2.8 ab 17 7(41.2) 6(35.3) 5(29.4)
  DMSO30 18 406 222 49.5±3.3 13.7±2.0b —— —— —— ——
  TCM24 18 306 208 62.0±3.6 23.3±5.1 ab —— —— —— ——
Adult cAMP30 18 257 162 58.8±5.4 26.5±3.0a 15 9(60) 7(46.7) 7(46.7)
  DMSO30 18 271 190 51.1±4.2 20.3±2.9ab —— —— —— ——
  TCM24 18 257 206 53.0±5.5 25.9±3.3a —— —— —— ——

* Data are the mean ± SEM.

Oocyte retrieval was performed via OPU. Different superscripts indicate statistical significances among treatments groups (a, b); P < 0.05. Lower blastocyst yields were found for oocytes treated with the DMSO30 protocol. Similar pregnancy rates were observed for blastocysts produced from prepubertal and adult donors using the cAMP30 treatment.