Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;7:67. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00067

Table 1.

Worldwide prevalence rates of cleft palate.

Country Rate per 10,000 (95% CI if available) References
USA* 5.9 (5.7–6.0) Mai et al., 2014
    California 5.81 (5.54–5.98) Saad et al., 2014
    Kentucky 5.70 Human Genetics Programme, 2007
    Alabama 5.37 Human Genetics Programme, 2007
    Colorado 4.83 Human Genetics Programme, 2007
    Hawaii 3.94 Human Genetics Programme, 2007
    Rhode Island 2.22 Human Genetics Programme, 2007
Canada* 7.02 (6.58–7.47) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    British Columbia 25.31 Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    Alberta 8.07 (6.70–9.63) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
Caribbean
    Cuba 1.35 (0.95–1.87) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
Central America
    Mexico 3.06 (2.46–3.76) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    Guatemala 4.7 Matute et al., 2014
South America
    Paraguay 6.83 (3.39–12.23) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    Brazil 4.49 (3.65–5.47) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    Colombia 1.69 (0.16–6.16) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
European Union
    Finland 14.31(13.12–15.58) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    Scotland 7.94 (5.95–10.39) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    Malta 14.13 (10.13–19.16) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
Africa
    South Africa 1.93 (1.49–2.46) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
    Nigeria 0.32 Butali et al., 2014a
South Asia
    India 1.7 Mossey and Little, 2009
    Nepal 3.5 Singh et al., 2012
East Asia
    China 2.36 (1.98–2.78) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
2.6 (2.4–2.7) Cooper et al., 2006
    Japan 4.54 (4.02–5.10) Mossey and Catilla, 2003
3.7 (3.2–4.1) Cooper et al., 2006
Australia 6.48 Mossey and Catilla, 2003
New Zealand 6.45 Mossey and Catilla, 2003
*

Top 3 highest and lowest rates per available states/provinces are provided.