Extended Data Table 2: Generalized linear models for the neonlcotlnold choice experiment and total food consumption in Figure 1.
B. terrestris | Choice test | Total food consumption | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between-subjects contrasts | df | χ 2 | P-value | df | χ 2 | P-value |
Concentration | 3 | 27.9 | <0.001 | 3 | 263 | <0.001 |
Neonicotinoid | 2 | 12.1 | 0.002 | 2 | 150 | <0.001 |
Neonic × Conc | 6 | 7.97 | 0.240 | 6 | 47.7 | <0.001 |
A. mellifera | Choice test | Total food consumption | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between-subjects contrasts | df | χ 2 | P-value | df | χ 2 | P-value |
Concentration | 3 | 4.93 | 0.176 | 3 | 37.1 | <0.001 |
Neonicotinoid | 2 | 11.1 | 0.004 | 2 | 10.5 | 0.005 |
Neonic × Conc | 6 | 5.89 | 0.435 | 6 | 11.4 | 0.076 |
Values in bold indicate interpreted model parameters. Note: sucrose-sucrose (control) data were not included.