Table 4.
Methods | When | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Video | • To capture the delivery of the intervention • Post-intervention to elicit reflection and retrospective sense-making |
To show participants to help them recall and talk through what they were thinking at certain points during delivery of the intervention |
To capture non-verbal interactions allowing rigorous post-hoc collaborative review on engagement, elements of work and division of labour undertaken by the facilitator and participant | ||
Non-participant observation | • Researcher observed the facilitated intervention and took notes using a framework with emphasis on demonstrating sense-making and buy-in | To identify points where there were difficulties in understanding and engagement with the intervention. Timings were noted so that point in the video could be revisited during video-elicitation |
Interviews | • Immediately following intervention (T1) • 2 weeks—phone call (to check on uptake of chosen activities) • 6 months face-to-face plus noting of changes in circles diagram (T2) • 12 months—phone call plus noting of changes in circles diagram (T3) |
To answer questions about the intervention’s relevance, acceptability, ease of use, promotion of new insights and potential beneficiaries. |
To allow a longitudinal dimension to capture change |