Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;7(2):92–107. doi: 10.1177/2040622315620180

Table 2.

Weight loss effect of liraglutide in the SCALE series.

Trial name Study population Study design Duration Weight loss Statistical significance
Placebo 1.8 mg 3.0 mg
SCALE – diabetes
  • n = 846

  • Age 18 years or older

  • BMI 27.0 or higher

  • T2DM

  • Up to 3 oral hypoglycaemic agents

  • Any sulfonylurea reduced by 50%, other oral hypoglycaemics continue

  • Lifestyle intervention

56 weeks −2.0% −4.7% −6.0% p = <0.001 for 1.8 mg and 3.0 mg doses versus placebo
Study arms:
  • 1) Liraglutide 1.8 mg

  • 2) Liraglutide 3.0 mg

  • 3) Liraglutide placebo

SCALE – pre-diabetes
  • n = 3731

  • Age 18 years or older

  • BMI 30.0 or higher, or 27.0 or higher with hypertension or dyslipidaemia

  • No diabetes

  • Lifestyle intervention

56 weeks −2.6% N/A −8.0% p = <0.001 versus placebo
Study arms
  • (1) liraglutide 3.0 mg;

  • (2) liraglutide placebo.

SCALE - Maintenance
  • Age 18 years or older

  • BMI 30.0 or higher, or 27.0 or higher with hypertension or dyslipidaemia

  • Previous unsuccessful attempts at dietary weight loss

  • No diabetes

  • 12-week low calorie run-in

  • Patients with weight loss of 5% or greater continued into study

56 weeks −0.2% (in addition to run-in weight loss) N/A −6.2% (in addition to run-in weight loss p = <0.0001 versus placebo
Study arms:
  • (1) liraglutide 3.0 mg;

  • (2) liraglutide placebo.

SCALE – Sleep Apnoea
  • Age 18–64 years

  • BMI 30.0 or higher

  • Moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnoea

  • Unable or unwilling to use CPAP

  • No diabetes

  • Lifestyle intervention

36 weeks −1.6% N/A −5.7% p < 0.0001 versus placebo
Study arms:
  • (1) liraglutide 3.0 mg;

  • (2) liraglutide placebo.

OHG, Oral hypoglycaemic; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; N/A, not available.