Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 26;8(2):142–146. doi: 10.1177/1756287215617674

Table 2.

Comparison of standard, mini, ultra-mini and micro PCNL techniques.

PCNL technique Indication Stone free rate Blood transfusion Limitations Fragmentation device
Standard PCNL (24–30F) Large stones – any size (staghorn stones) High SFR (depending on stone complexity) 3–6% Increased risk with multiple tracts Pneumatic or ultrasound or laser
Mini PCNL (14–20F) Large stones High SFR (depending on stone complexity) 1–2% Longer operative time for larger stones (compared with standard PCNL) Pneumatic or Ultrasound or Laser
Ultra-mini (UMP) PCNL (11–13F) Stones up to 2 cm 85–92% Transfusion – not reported Able to remove small fragments only Laser
Micro PCNL (4.8F) Stones up to 1.5 cm 85–90% Transfusion – not reported Unable to remove fragments Laser

PCNL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR, stone free rates.