Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2014 Jul 8;27(1):293–308. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000637

Table 2.

Bivariate correlations among study variables.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13 14. 15. 16. 17. 18 19.
1. Dep W1 --
2. Dep W2 .53
3. Dep W3 .43 .49
4. Dep W4 .51 .44 .50
5. AS Stress W1 .41 .32 .25 .27
6. Acc Stress W2 .34 .29 .23 .17 .68
7. Acc stress W3 .28 .14 .15 .26 .50 .61
8. Acc stress W4 .31 .20 .20 .33 .47 .61 .78
9. Enc stress W1 .23 .22 .24 .09 .23 .06 −.12 −.11
10. Enc stress W2 .18 .23 .19 .07 .09 .26 .01 .05 .68
11. Enc stress W3 .12 .14 .21 .00 −.08 −.01 .09 .04 .56 .72
12. Enc stress W4 .05 .01 .06 .03 −.06 −.00 −.03 .17 .49 .54 .66
13. Warmth W1 −.27 −.13 −.25 −.10 .01 .11 .05 −.07 .03 .01 .04 −.03
14. Warmth W2 −.20 −.29 −.19 −.05 −.04 −.04 −.03 −.19 .05 −.04 −.00 −.03 .53
15. Warmth W3 −.24 −.15 −.22 −.13 − .01 −.00 −.08 −.16 .02 −.06 −.13 .01 .47 .63
16. Warmth W4 −.28 −.15 −.20 −.18 − .10 −.13 −.18 −.34 .09 −.01 −.00 −.05 .47 .61 .68
17. EH W1 .40 .20 .27 .34 .27 .28 .25 .31 .09 .11 .02 .03 − .09 −.09 −.19 −.23
18. EH W2 .39 .31 .22 .24 .31 .41 .34 .38 .03 .07 .01 .03 − .10 −.17 −.01 −.22 .45
19. EH W3 .34 .28 .26 .29 .33 .44 .40 .49 −.03 .09 .06 .08 − .14 −.10 −.14 −.21 .41 .61
20. EH W4 .30 .30 .23 .41 .25 .22 .26 .31 −.09 .03 −.03 .05 − .09 −.02 −.03 −.14 .42 .53 .61

Note. For correlations, sample size varied from 147 to 204 due to missing data. For all MLM analyses, however, maximum likelihood estimation was used and included the full sample (N = 204). Dep = depressive symptoms; Acc stress = Acculturative stress; Enc stress = Enculturative stress; Warmth = Maternal warmth; EH = Economic hardship; W1 – W4 = Wave 1 – Wave 4; Correlations higher than .14 p < .05, higher than .19 p < .01, and higher than .26 p < .001.