Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 8;352:i493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i493

Table 2.

Agreement of treatment effects reported in RCD studies and subsequent randomized trial evidence

Analysis No of treatment comparisons Summary ROR (95% CI) I2 (%; 95% CI)
Main analysis
Random effect models to combine RCTs 16 1.31 (1.03 to 1.65) 0 (0 to 45)
Sensitivity analyses
Fixed effect models to combine RCTs 16 1.34 (1.09 to 1.63) 0 (0 to 45)
Exclusion of RCTs with high risk of bias 14 1.21 (0.92 to 1.59) 0 (0 to 47)
Exclusion of RCTs with high treatment crossover rates or with asymmetric crossover 15 1.34 (1.05 to 1.70) 0 (0 to 46)
RCTs that had low treatment crossover rates 12 1.27 (0.92 to 1.76) 0 (0 to 51)
Exclusion of RCTs with frequent non-initiation of randomized treatment 16 1.31 (1.04 to 1.65) 0 (0 to 45)
Exclusion of RCTs with age differences >2 SD 16 1.28 (1.01 to 1.62) 0 (0 to 45)
Two subquestions instead of main question 15 1.33 (1.05 to 1.68) 0 (0 to 46)
Exclusion of treatment comparison with RCTs that are also pertinent for another treatment comparison 15 1.28 (1.01 to 1.62) 0 (0 to 46)
RCTs that were identified in available systematic reviews 10 1.21 (0.88 to 1.65) 0 (0 to 53)
RCD studies with low risk of bias except for “bias due to confounding”* 11 1.20 (0.89 to 1.62) 0 (0 to 51)

RCD=routinely collected health data; RCT=randomized controlled trial; ROR=relative odds ratio; SD=standard deviation.

*All RCD studies were deemed to have moderate risk of bias due to confounding.