TABLE 5.
EQ-5D Summary of Results
| Author, Year | Convergent Validity | Validity—Known Groups | Responsiveness TSS | Responsiveness ES/SRM | |||||||
| H1 | H2 | H3 | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H1 | H2 | H3 | H1 | |
| Aghayev et al, 201049 | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Bastiaenen et al, 200824 | ± | ± | X | ||||||||
| Berg et al, 200925 | √ | ||||||||||
| Berg et al, 200926 | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Burstrom et al, 200141 | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Carr et al, 200527 | ± | ± | √ | ||||||||
| Casserley-Feeney et al, 201228 | ± | ± | √ | ||||||||
| Cheshire et al, 201150 | √ | ||||||||||
| Chown et al, 200829 | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Cox et al, 201030 | ± | ||||||||||
| Del Pozo-Cruz et al, 201131 | √ | ||||||||||
| Djais et al, 200532 | ± | ± | √ | ||||||||
| Eker et al, 200751 | ? | X | √ | ||||||||
| Garratt et al, 200152 | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Genevay et al, 201253 | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Gilbert et al, 200433 | ± | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Gilbert et al, 200434 | ± | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Gutke et al, 201154 | √ | ||||||||||
| Gutke et al, 200655 | √ | ||||||||||
| Hellum et al, 201135 | √ | ± | √ | ||||||||
| Hurley et al, 200136 | ± | √ | |||||||||
| Jansson et al, 200956 | √ | ± | – | ||||||||
| Kendrick et al, 200137 | X | ||||||||||
| Klemenc-Ketis, 201142 | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Klemenc-Ketis, 201157 | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Kovacs et al, 200558 | √ | √ X | – | √ | |||||||
| Kovacs et al, 200459 | √ | √ X | |||||||||
| Miller et al, 200238 | X | ||||||||||
| Muraki et al, 201143 | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Muraki et al, 201044 | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Parker et al, 201245 | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Rivero-Arrias et al, 200639 | – | ||||||||||
| Schluessman et al, 200946 | √ | ||||||||||
| Sogaard et al, 200947 | X | ||||||||||
| Suarez-Almazor et al, 200048 | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Van der Roer et al, 200660 | √ | √ | – | ||||||||
| Wilkens et al, 201040 | ± | ± | √ X | ||||||||
Keys: √ Meeting prior expectations; ± trend meeting prior expectation but not statistically significant; - trend meeting prior expectation but no test of statistical significance performed; X trend nonmeeting prior expectations; ? mixed/not possible to assess.
When two keys for the same item are used, it is because more than one result was found.
ES indicates effect size; H1, hypothesis 1; H2, hypothesis 2; H3, hypothesis 3; H4, hypothesis 4; TSS, test of statistical significance.