Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;41(6):E364–E374. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001247

TABLE 5.

EQ-5D Summary of Results

Author, Year Convergent Validity Validity—Known Groups Responsiveness TSS Responsiveness ES/SRM
H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H4 H1 H2 H3 H1
Aghayev et al, 201049
Bastiaenen et al, 200824 ± ± X
Berg et al, 200925
Berg et al, 200926
Burstrom et al, 200141
Carr et al, 200527 ± ±
Casserley-Feeney et al, 201228 ± ±
Cheshire et al, 201150
Chown et al, 200829
Cox et al, 201030 ±
Del Pozo-Cruz et al, 201131
Djais et al, 200532 ± ±
Eker et al, 200751 ? X
Garratt et al, 200152
Genevay et al, 201253
Gilbert et al, 200433 ±
Gilbert et al, 200434 ±
Gutke et al, 201154
Gutke et al, 200655
Hellum et al, 201135 ±
Hurley et al, 200136 ±
Jansson et al, 200956 ±
Kendrick et al, 200137 X
Klemenc-Ketis, 201142
Klemenc-Ketis, 201157
Kovacs et al, 200558 √ X
Kovacs et al, 200459 √ X
Miller et al, 200238 X
Muraki et al, 201143
Muraki et al, 201044
Parker et al, 201245
Rivero-Arrias et al, 200639
Schluessman et al, 200946
Sogaard et al, 200947 X
Suarez-Almazor et al, 200048
Van der Roer et al, 200660
Wilkens et al, 201040 ± ± √ X

Keys: √ Meeting prior expectations; ± trend meeting prior expectation but not statistically significant; - trend meeting prior expectation but no test of statistical significance performed; X trend nonmeeting prior expectations; ? mixed/not possible to assess.

When two keys for the same item are used, it is because more than one result was found.

ES indicates effect size; H1, hypothesis 1; H2, hypothesis 2; H3, hypothesis 3; H4, hypothesis 4; TSS, test of statistical significance.