Table 7.
Hypothesis 4: Cox Regression of Divorce Hazard on Insurance Status, Access to Employment-based Option, and Gender
| Model 4. Cox Regression of Divorce Hazard on Insurance Status, Access to Employment-based Option, and Gender (hazards in odds ratios) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-way interaction between insurance status, access to employment-based option, and gender | ||||
| Insurance Status | Access to Employment-based Option | Gender | ||
| Insured under own name | Yes | Male | (reference) | |
| Yes | Female | 1.70*** | ||
| No | Male | 0.75 | ||
| No | Female | 0.75 | ||
| Insured under someone else's plan | Yes | Male | 0.44* | a |
| Yes | Female | 0.61* | b | |
| No | Male | 0.49 | c | |
| No | Female | 0.19*** | d | |
| Gov't Insurance (Medicare, Medicaid) | Yes | Male | 0.22 | |
| Yes | Female | 2.03* | ||
| No | Male | 0.41* | ||
| No | Female | 0.49*** | ||
| Uninsured | Yes | Male | 1.13 | |
| Yes | Female | 1.49 | ||
| No | Male | 0.52* | ||
| No | Female | 0.47** | ||
| Logged family monthly income | 0.40*** | |||
| Test of Hypothesis 4: Not having an alternative source of health insurance outside the marriage lowers divorce risk for women more so than for men | ||
|---|---|---|
| Key Coefficients for Hypothesis Test | ||
| c | Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & male | 0.49 |
| d | Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & female | 0.18*** |
| Ratio of d to c | 0.37* | |
| Not having an alternative source of health insurance outside the marriage lowers divorce risk for men | ||
| a | Insured under someone else's plan & has employment-based option & male | 0.44* |
| c | Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & male | 0.49 |
| Ratio of c to a | 1.12 | |
| Not having an alternative source of health insurance outside the marriage lowers divorce risk for women | ||
| b | Insured under someone else's plan & has employment-based option & female | 0.61* |
| d | Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & female | 0.18*** |
| Ratio of d to b | 0.30*** | |
Note: Model includes age, age-squared, race, education, children, higher-order marriage, and marriage duration as controls. Coefficients are not shown. N=17,388 (men n=8,091; women n=9,297). Values are weighted to represent the US population.
Note: P-values of one-sided t-tests are corrected adjusted for False Discovery Rate (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995).
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .005.