Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2015 Mar 24;77(4):982–995. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12195

Table 7.

Hypothesis 4: Cox Regression of Divorce Hazard on Insurance Status, Access to Employment-based Option, and Gender

Model 4. Cox Regression of Divorce Hazard on Insurance Status, Access to Employment-based Option, and
Gender (hazards in odds ratios)
Three-way interaction between insurance status, access to employment-based option, and gender
  Insurance Status Access to Employment-based Option Gender
  Insured under own name Yes Male (reference)
Yes Female 1.70***
No Male 0.75
No Female 0.75
  Insured under someone else's plan Yes Male 0.44* a
Yes Female 0.61* b
No Male 0.49 c
No Female 0.19*** d
  Gov't Insurance (Medicare, Medicaid) Yes Male 0.22
Yes Female 2.03*
No Male 0.41*
No Female 0.49***
  Uninsured Yes Male 1.13
Yes Female 1.49
No Male 0.52*
No Female 0.47**
Logged family monthly income 0.40***
Test of Hypothesis 4: Not having an alternative source of health insurance outside the marriage lowers divorce risk
for women more so than for men
Key Coefficients for Hypothesis Test
c Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & male 0.49
d Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & female 0.18***

Ratio of d to c 0.37*
Not having an alternative source of health insurance outside the marriage lowers divorce risk for men
a Insured under someone else's plan & has employment-based option & male 0.44*
c Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & male 0.49

Ratio of c to a 1.12
Not having an alternative source of health insurance outside the marriage lowers divorce risk for women
b Insured under someone else's plan & has employment-based option & female 0.61*
d Insured under someone else's plan & has no employment-based option & female 0.18***

Ratio of d to b 0.30***

Note: Model includes age, age-squared, race, education, children, higher-order marriage, and marriage duration as controls. Coefficients are not shown. N=17,388 (men n=8,091; women n=9,297). Values are weighted to represent the US population.

Note: P-values of one-sided t-tests are corrected adjusted for False Discovery Rate (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .005.