Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Geriatr Med Gerontol. 2015 Sep 2;1(1):003. doi: 10.23937/2469-5858/1510003

Table 3.

Ordinal Scales

Battery Components Scoring Psychometrics

Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) Balance subscale = 9 items Range: 0 – 28 Reliability: Pearson r =0.85
Gait subscale = 8 items ≤ 18 - High fall risk Validity: r = 0.91 (vs BBS)
Takes ~10 mins to complete ≥ 25 - Low fall risk

Mini-BESTest Fourteen items Item score: 0 – 2 Test-retest reliability ICC = 0.96
Takes 10 – 15 mins to complete Inter-rater reliability ICC = 0.98
Convergent reliability = r = 0.85 (vs. BBS)

Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Task performance = 7 items Range: 0 – 56 Reliability: kappa coefficient = 0.98
Posture maintenance= 7 items ≤ 20- High fall risk Validity: r = 0.91 (vs POMA)
Takes ~20 mins to complete 21 – 40- Moderate fall risk Internal consistency: Cronbach α = 0.96
> 40 - Low fall risk

Brunel Balance Hierarchy of 12 items
Takes ~10 mins to complete
Pass/fail at each level
Patient progresses to next level until failure
Coefficient of reproducibility1= 0.99 Assessment
Coefficient of scalability (subjects)2 = 0.88 (BBA)
Coefficient of scalability (items)2= 0.69
Item-Total Correlation = 0.34 – 0.84
Internal consistency: Cronbach α = 0.92
Reliability (kappa coefficient) = 1.0
Validity (Spearman rho; vs BBS) = 0.97
1

coefficient of reproducibility is the likelihood that the patient will fail all the items following the final item passed and pass all the items preceding it.

2

coefficient of scalability is the proportion of scaling errors to “maximum errors”. Maximum errors are extreme scores - the number of subjects who pass or fall all items or the number of items passed or failed by all subjects.

Both coefficients and the step-wise negative correlation between pass rate and task difficulty are measures of hierarchy.