Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0150487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150487

Table 2. A comparison of TB yield in smear/culture and Xpert® based algorithms and trends over time.

TB yield 95% CI Risk difference (95% CI) p-value
All cases (simple model)
Smear/culture-based algorithm 20.9% 19.9% to 22.0% -3.0% (-4.3% to -1.7%) <0.001
Xpert-based algorithm 17.9% 16.4% to 19.5%
All cases adjusted for MDR-TB risk
Smear/culture-based algorithm 20.1% 18.8% to 21.5% -2.9% (16.4% to 19.5%) <0.001
Xpert-based algorithm 17.2% 15.4% to 19.0%
Amongst low MDR-TB risk cases (simple model)
Smear/culture-based algorithm 20.3% 19.0% to 21.5% -3.2% (-4.9% to -1.4%) <0.001
Xpert-based algorithm 17.1% 15.1% to 19.1%
Amongst high MDR-TB risk cases (simple model)
Smear/culture-based algorithm 24.4% 23.2% to 25.6% -2.3% (-3.8% to -0.7%) 0.004
Xpert-based algorithm 22.1% 21.0% to 23.3%
For cases in both the smear/culture and Xpert-based algorithms by time point (simple model)
T1 (November 2010) 23.6% 22.2% to 25.1% -0.9% (-1.2% to -0.6%)a <0.001
T2 (May 2011) 20.4% 19.1% to 21.8%
T3 (November 2011) 19.4% 18.3% to 20.5%
T4 (May 2012) 17.4% 15.8% to 19.1%
T5 (November 2012) 19.5% 17.8% to 21.2%
T6 (May 2013) 16.6% 15.0% to 18.2%
T7 (November 2013) 17.5% 15.0% to 20.0%
All cases adjusted for temporal trends
Smear/culture-based algorithm 19.1% 17.6% to 20.5% 0.3% (-1.8% to 2.3%) 0.796
Xpert-based algorithm 19.3% 17.7% to 20.9%

The table shows TB yield comparisons between the smear/culture and Xpert-based algorithms and temporal trends in yield at time-points T1 to T7 in primary health sites in Cape Town. The outputs are from a binomial regression model, adjusted for clustering of presumptive TB cases at sites. In the simple model adjustments have not been made for differences in MDR-TB risk profiles between the algorithms or for temporal trends.

aThis is the mean risk difference per time point and 95% confidence interval.

Abbreviations: TB—tuberculosis, MDR-TB—multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, CI—confidence interval.