Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0147875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147875

Table 1. Number of SNPs under selection for a) each year as detected with BAYESCAN, and the individual population as detected with WFABC for b) a small (Ne = 50), and c) and a large (Ne = 500) effective population size.

For each method the number of SNPs under positive and negative selection are given along with their distribution among chromosomes (chr1–chr6) where identifiable, or otherwise listed without chromosome location (NA).

Location/ year Positive selection Negative selection Chr1 Chr2 Chr3 Chr4 Chr5 Chr6 NA
a) 1999 17 - 7 1 6 1 - - 2
2004 43 - 9 3 8 10 6 3 4
2009 113 - 24 22 20 24 12 7 4
2013 101 - 30 14 12 18 16 7 4
b) Woolnorth 2 - - - 2 - - - -
Arthur River 1 1 - 1 1 - - - -
Narawntapu - 1 - 1 - - - - -
Mt William 3 - - 2 - - 1 - -
Freycinet 5 1 2 - 3 1 1 - -
Forestier 3 1 - 2 - - - 2 -
c) Woolnorth 39 7 11 5 11 10 3 5 1
Arthur River 27 32 9 14 18 9 4 2 3
Narawntapu 33 21 14 17 6 5 3 5 4
Mt William 62 34 23 21 9 18 13 8 4
Freycinet 37 23 14 12 18 3 6 5 2
Forestier 37 43 26 16 10 11 4 9 4