Table 2. Pairwise number of shared SNPs under selection in Tasmanian devil populations assuming a large effective population size (N_e = 500).

The patterns are column–by–row for a) SNPs under selection in the same direction, positive–positive (above diagonal) and negative-negative (below diagonal), and b) SNPs under selection in opposite direction, positive-negative (above diagonal) and negative-positive (below diagonal).

			Site number
			1	2	3	4	5	6
a)		Positive/positive
	Negative/negative	1. Woolnorth	-	0	1	2	2	0
		2. Arthur River	0	-	2	3	0	1
		3. Narawntapu	0	0	-	1	1	3
		4. Mt William	0	2	0	-	0	1
		5. Freycinet	0	0	0	0	-	1
		6. Forestier	1	1	2	1	2	-
b)		Positive/negative
	Negative/positive	1. Woolnorth	-	0	1	2	1	2
		2. Arthur River	1	-	4	0	0	1
		3. Narawntapu	0	1	-	1	0	1
		4. Mt William	0	1	3	-	2	4
		5. Freycinet	0	0	0	0	-	1
		6. Forestier	0	3	0	1	1	-