Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 23;36(3):230–234. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.3.230

Table 2. Summary of results from the second phase of EQA.

Sample Correct results Kit CT (Mean±SD) N of participants*
upE ORF1a
A 100% AccuPower 28.1 ± 0.6 29.8 ± 0.2 4
PowerChek 25.8 ± 0.9 26.5 ± 0.7 31
DiaPlexQ 28.0 ± 1.9 26.8 ± 2.2 9
Others* 26.5 ± 1.3 27.1 ± 1.4 3
Total 26.6 ± 1.6 27.0 ± 1.6 47
B 100% AccuPower 31.6 ± 0.7 33.3 ± 0.2 4
PowerChek 29.5 ± 1.0 30.2 ± 0.9 31
DiaPlexQ 30.5 ± 1.8 30.6 ± 2.4 9
Others* 30.1 ± 1.3 30.7 ± 1.4 3
Total 30.2 ± 1.5 30.7 ± 1.6 47
C 100% AccuPower Negative Negative 4
PowerChek Negative Negative 31
DiaPlexQ Negative Negative 9
Others* Negative Negative 3
Total Negative Negative 47

*This includes laboratory-developed test, MERS-CoV Detection kit (Nanobiosys, Seoul, Korea) and ModularDx kit MERS-CoV (TIB MOLBIOL, Berlin, Germany).

Abbreviations: EQA, external quality assessment; CT, threshold cycle.